Paul,

 

I have no arguments there J.  I am trying to push the envelope as much as
possible in these labs to make sure I am not missing anything for you guys.
Thus we are running into a few issues J

 

Regards,

 

Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security

Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.


Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 
Cell: +1.248.504.7309
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto:  [email protected]

 

Join our free online support and peer group communities:
<http://www.IPexpert.com/communities> http://www.IPexpert.com/communities

 

IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On Demand
and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE
Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage
Lab Certifications.

 

From: Paul Stewart [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 12:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Tyson Scott
Subject: Re: 2a HA Items

 

The issue may be the bug below.  I took the advice and bounced the interface
on R1.  This did cause it to converge, then it rebooted because of the CBAC
HA.  When it came up R6 rebooted.  Strange thing is it is now working.  This
stuff is so flaky.  This is like alpha stuff in my opinion.  I'd never use
this in production.  


CSCsy89234 Bug Details  

SNAT state never converge after reloading or configuring SNAT
Symptoms: Stateful Fail-over of Network Address Translation (SNAT) in
primary/backup mode does not converge.

Conditions: Occurs after a no shut interface following a
router reload, and then configure SNAT on the primary router.

Workaround: Perform a shut/no shut of the SNAT interface on
the primary router.

On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Paul Stewart <[email protected]> wrote:

I've not checked the bug report, but that is a good point.  I'll let you
know if I find anything.  Thanks for the quick response on a Saturday night.

 

On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Tyson Scott <[email protected]> wrote:

Paul,

 

Have you checked the Bug report at all?  I know we need to upgrade these
routers for several reasons to the new (22)T2 but not sure at this time.  I
don't remember well enough from this lab for sure what I tested when it was
done.  The NAT entries where definitely there or maybe I forgot to save it
during all those annoying reboots.  I will have to go back to that lab and
retest several things like all the crashes on R2 (Which I think is resolved
in (22)T2, as I had a similar problem in a lab I am working on but no longer
with the new code.)  Let me know if you find anything and I will keep you
informed of anything I find when I come back to this after finishing some
labs that I am about ready to release.

 

Regards,

 

Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security

Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.


Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 
Cell: +1.248.504.7309
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto:  [email protected]

 

Join our free online support and peer group communities:
<http://www.IPexpert.com/communities> http://www.IPexpert.com/communities

 

IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On Demand
and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE
Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage
Lab Certifications.

 

From: Paul Stewart [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 10:38 PM
To: Tyson Scott
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 2a HA Items

 

I have worked with this quite a bit.  I understand how it is supposed to
work and can get SNAT and stateful CBAC to work well independently of one
another.  I labbed this up and had the same issues.  Everything worked until
I go to 2.8.  Then SNAT breaks.  

So I decided to revert and bring in the final configs on R1 and R6.  The
error went away, but SNAT was broken worse than ever.  I noticed that the
"ip inspect log drop-pkt" was not in the config (probably not a requirement,
but is quite handy).  I put that in expecting to see the error.  No error,
but no SNAT peers either.  I decided to remove the ACL and INSPECT from
fa0/1.1256.  Still no go.  Then I noticed that the nat statement is
completely missing from the final config on R6.  It is also missing in the
download from the download area.

I added the nat statement and SNAT converged.  I went back and merged the
rest of the config back in and all was still well.  Then stateful CBAC
required 2 reboots of R6.  At this point with "ip inspect log drop-pkt"
enabled, the errors return and stateful NAT is no longer converging.  

So I don't know if this is a bug or what.  However, I'm not sure this lab
fully works when you bring 2.8 into the picture.  As I mentioned earlier, I
do question the stateful ID number.  It seems to work even with them both
being the same until you actually turn the inspections on in 2.8.  However
every book and document that I can find that has any detail, says this is
used to determine which router created a nat entry and should be unique per
router.  Basically it is an extra field in a NAT entry.  I'm not sure how
that matters, unless it gives special rights to the router to  delete those
tranlations.

I guess I am curious if anyone has made certain that CBAC HA was functioning
correctly, then rechecked Stateful NAT to see that the child entries were
creating?  Am I missing something?




On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Paul Stewart <[email protected]> wrote:

They are not propogated.  However, they even after the the CBAC and the
INSPECT HA were configured.  Once I rebooted, and a "show redundancy
inter-device" showed good, SNAT was no longer propogated.

 

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Tyson Scott <[email protected]> wrote:

Sorry,

 

Let me correct that.  Did you check the Stateful NAT table to see if the
entries are properly propegated?

 

Regards,

 

Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security

Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.


Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 
Cell: +1.248.504.7309
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto:  [email protected]

 

Join our free online support and peer group communities:
<http://www.IPexpert.com/communities> http://www.IPexpert.com/communities

 

IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On Demand
and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE
Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage
Lab Certifications.

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 10:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Security] 2a HA Items

 

I get the following when I combine stateful CBAC and Stateful NAT.  When I
enable Stateful NAT all is well.  Stateful CBAC all is well, until you do
the reboot that is required to bring the redundancy scheme into sync.  Then
it seems as though it breaks the stateful nat.  Really in this case,
stateful nat is unnecessary, because it is all one to one.  However, the
directions ask for stateful NAT, so I assume that we need to get it so the
child sessions can be created.  I guess my question is what is the error
below trying to tell me?



*Aug  1 03:11:57.213: %FW-6-DROP_PKT: Dropping udp session 9.9.156.11:15555
9.9.156.6:15555  due to device running in HA standby mode with ip ident
12839
R6#
*Aug  1 03:12:27.213: %FW-6-DROP_PKT: Dropping udp session 9.9.156.11:15555
9.9.156.6:15555  due to device running in HA standby mode with ip ident
13323

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to