ccing ccie study

On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Kingsley Charles <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Simon
>
> The following ACL is enough to be configured on the GETVPN server.
>
> permit ip host 22.22.22.1 any
> permit ip host 77.77.77.1 any
> permit ip host 88.88.88.1 any
>
> But the above ACL will encrypt all the traffic from 22.22.22.1, 77.77.771
> abd 88.88.88.1.
>
> Given below is the specific ACL.
>
> permit ip host 22.22.22.1 77.77.77.1
> permit ip host 22.22.22.1 88.88.88.1
> permit ip host 88.88.88.1 22.22.22.1
> permit ip host 77.77.77.1 22.22.22.1
> permit ip host 88.88.88.1 77.77.77.1
> permit ip host 77.77.77.1 88.88.88.1
>
> You need to start with deny statements, when you don't want specific
> traffic to be encrypted. For example, the creteria is to encrypt 10.20.30.0
> subnet
> but you don't neet to encrypt any ssh session and traffic from 10.20.30.4
>
> deny tcp 10.20.30.0 any eq ssh
> deny udp 10.20.30.0 any eq ssh
> deny ip 10.20.30.4 any
> permit ip 10.20.30.0 any
>
>
> You also have an option to associate an ACL in the Group member crypto map
> to deny traffic.
>
> With regards
> Kings
>   On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Simon Baumann 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Segun, ok, thanks. I don't want to encrypt all raffic, only the
>> traffic to the loopbacks.
>>
>> Regards
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>  Am 29.08.2009 um 12:23 schrieb 'Segun Daini:
>>
>>   Hi Simon,
>>
>> The getvpn acl need to match intresting traffic-since there's a default
>> deny after ur acl you really dont need to put the 3 deny statements you have
>> there.
>>
>> You would need to put a deny before permit if there are specific IPs
>> within your permit network that shld not be encrypted. And in ur example,
>> the traffic u denied does not match any of the permitted traffic, therefore
>> i do not think its necesary.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* Simon Baumann <[email protected]>
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Sent:* Saturday, August 29, 2009 2:09:15 PM
>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Security] Clarification about GET VPN.
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>> I'm setting up an GET VPN environmet at a security ProtcorLabs pod. My
>> scenario looks like this:
>>
>> Used devices: cat2, r1, r7, r8
>>
>> cat2:
>> vlan 2, int vlan2: ip addr 2.2.2.254
>> vlan 7, int vlan 7: ip addr 7.7.7.254
>> vlan 8, int vlan 8: ip addr 8.8.8.254
>>
>> Server: r1
>> Clients: r7 and r8
>>
>> r1: fa0/1: ip addr 2.2.2.1, lo0: 22.22.22.1. Default route to fa0/1.
>> r7: fa0/0: ip addr 7.7.7.1, lo0 77.77.77.1. Default route to fa 0/0.
>> r8: fa0/0: ip addr 8.8.8.1, lo0 88.88.88.1. Default route to fa 0/0.
>>
>> I want to protect traffic between the loopbacks of my router. But I'm
>> not sure how I have to configure my ACL to only
>> match this traffic.
>>
>> The Cisco documentation states: "Ensure that your ACL starts with a
>> deny statement if all traffic does not need to be encrypted."
>>
>> So in my case, this would be the following ACL?
>>
>>
>> ip access-list extended GET_VPN
>>   deny  ip host 2.2.2.1 any
>>   deny  ip host 8.8.8.1 any
>>   deny  ip host 7.7.7.1 any
>>   permit ip host 22.22.22.1 any
>>   permit ip host 77.77.77.1 any
>>   permit ip host 88.88.88.1 any
>>
>> TIA.
>>
>> Have a nice weekend
>>
>> Simon
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to