Congrats Tyson!!!...let me guess SP??



________________________________
From: Wayne Lawson <[email protected]>
To: Tyson Scott <[email protected]>
Cc: "<[email protected]>" <[email protected]>; 
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2009 2:24:32 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Transparent firewall with trunking


Tyson - Update your signature to reflect your THIRD CCIE!

Congrats again! ;-)

Regards,

Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
Founder & President - IPexpert, Inc.  
Mailto: [email protected]
Mobile: +1.810.334.1564

:: Message sent from iPhone. 

On Oct 5, 2009, at 9:14 AM, "Tyson Scott" <[email protected]> wrote:


>
>>
>Nabil,
> 
>That is right on.  The same concept when using the IPS.  Just
>change ASA to IPS in the middle and the concept is the same for inline or
>inline VLAN pair.
> 
>>
>Regards,
> 
>Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security
>Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>
>>Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 
>>Cell: +1.248.504.7309
>>Fax: +1.810.454.0130
>>Mailto:  [email protected]
> 
>Join our free online support and peer group communities: 
>http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
> 
>IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
>Video On Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE
>R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
>CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
> 
>>
>>
>From:[email protected] 
>>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nabil
>Omar
>Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 8:50 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Cc: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Transparent firewall with trunking
> 
>The reason for using two Vlans I think is a
>matter of Design , that is used to avoid bypassing the Firewall .
>>Because usually in real life you have the Vlans spanned across all the 
>>switches
>, So if somebody messed the cabling , and for example connected 
>>the two switches together with a cable , in this case if The INSIDE and 
>>OUTSIDE
>are in the Same vlan , The user will be able to communicate with the outside
>without any restriction (bypassing the Firewall ) , But if they are in
>different vlans they will not be able to communicate Unless through the
>Firewall , Because it is Bridging between though two vlans.
>>That is my opinion , Correct my If I am wrong .
>
>>Scenario with Same Vlans on both Sides
>>
> switch
>---- trunk-------------ASA ------trunk-------------switch
>>       |          
> 
>                                                        
>|
>>       
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>>                                 
>Wrong Cabled Trunk Link
>>vlan 2 -
>10.20.30.0                                           
>vlan 2 - 10.20.30.0 
>>vlan 3 -
>20.10.30.0                                           
>vlan 3 - 20.10.30.0 
>
>>Best Regards
>>Nabil
> 
>>
________________________________
 >
>Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:50:22 +0530
>>From: [email protected]
>>To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
>>CC: [email protected]
>>Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Transparent firewall with trunking
>>
>Thanks
>to all for your inputs.
>>
> 
>>
>I
>just wanted to do some investigation in my lab before replying.
>>
> 
>>
> 
>
>>
>Various
>cases
>>
> 
>>
>IPS
>(inline) is transparent and doesn't disturb the setup
>>
> 
>>
> 
>>
> switch
>---- trunk-------------IPS >------trunk-------------switch
>> 
>>vlan 2 - 10.20.30.0                                              
>vlan 2 - 10.20.30.0 
>>vlan 3 -
>20.10.30.0                                               
>vlan 3 - 20.10.30.0  
>>
> 
>>
>Switch
>is transparent and doesn't disturb the setup
>>
> 
>>
> 
>>
> switch
>---- trunk-------------switch >------trunk-------------switch
>> 
>>vlan 2 -
>10.20.30.0                                              
>vlan 2 - 10.20.30.0 
>>vlan 3 -
>20.10.30.0                                        
>      vlan 3 - 20.10.30.0  
>>
> 
>>
>Tranparent
>firewall ASA requires for vlans
>>
> 
>>
> switch
>---- trunk-------------ASA ------trunk-------------switch
>> 
>>vlan 2 -
>10.20.30.0                                           
>vlan 6 - 10.20.30.0 
>>vlan 3 -
>20.10.30.0                                           
>vlan 7 - 20.10.30.0  
>>
> 
>>
> 
>>
> 
>>
>I
>was about to talk about the trunking inspection done by IPS sensor. 
>>
> 
>>
>With
>IPS sensor, if you need to monitor the traffic between a trunk link, you need
>to just configure an inline pair interface and insert the two trunk links from
>the two switches into two interfaces of the sensor that has been paired. 
>Here I need not disturb the swtich setup. It is very transparent. If you
>want, you can use vlan groups and put each sub-interfaces in different virtual
>sesnor.
>>
> 
>>
>But
>when it comes to ASA for the above topology where IPS sensor was placed it, we
>need to bridge between different vlans.
>>
> 
>>
>I
>am actually aware of that we need different vlans when we put ASA in
>between a trunk.
>>
> 
>>
>But
>I am actually searching for a reason from anyone of
>why did Cisco implement this way of requiring two vlans and thereby forcing one
>of swtiches to their vlan for inserting the ASA in between. 
>>
> 
>>
>With
>IPS sensor, the job was easy. With ASA, I need to reconfigure the vlans on
>switches.
>>
> 
>>
>With
>IOS router or ASA in routing mode, is it inter-vlan routing there we definitely
>need different vlans to route between vlans.
>>
> 
>>
>But
>with transparent firewall, why do we need different vlans for bridging a
>subnet. Transparent means plug and play, right?
>>
> 
>>
>I
>just wanted others thoughts on this Cisco's way of implementation to be sure
>that I remove the mis-understanding from my mind. 
>>
> 
>>
>So
>I have posted this mail here.
>>
> 
>>
> 
>>
> 
>>
> 
>>
> 
>>
> 
>>
> 
>>
>With
>regards
>>
>Kings
>>
> 
>>
>
>
>> 
>>
>On
>Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Paul Stewart <[email protected]> wrote:
>In my opinion, the best example of
>transparent firewalling in the way described is vlan pairs on the IPS
>appliance.  The concept of using transparent Firewall to bridge two VLANs
>is exactly the same as using a VLAN pair on an IPS to bridge two vlans. 
>In both cases, both of the vlans exist in the same layer 3 subnet. 
>However, for devices in vlan x to talk to devices in vlan y, they must go
>through the transparent firewall, just like they would have to go through the
>IPS.  The IPS simply has a less strictly defined role than that of a
>firewall.
>
>>_______________________________________________
>>For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>>visit
>www.ipexpert.com
> 
>>
________________________________
 >
>Keep
>your friends updated— even when you’re not signed in.
_______________________________________________
>For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>visit www.ipexpert.com
>


      
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to