Hi Kings,

As per my understanding, Tacacs separates Authentication from Authorization 
while Radius combines them together in ne process or phase and that's why you 
are getting this error.

What you need to do is:
- configure a downloadable access list
- assign that downloadable  access-list to a user
- type the following command

access-group outin in interface Outside per-user-override

The per-user-override
keyword allows dynamic access lists that are downloaded for user
authorization to override the access list assigned to the interface.

so these command will be enough

aaa authentication match mine inside mine
no aaa authorization match mine inside mine

HTH

Regards,
Mohammed Gazzaz

Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 18:57:48 +0530
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Cut-through proxy doesn't support radius 
authorization for downloadable ACLs

Hi all
 
I am trying to configure Radius downloadable ACLs with cut-through proxy. The 
ASA is not allowing me to associate the Radius AAA group to the authorization 
method list.
 
primary(config)# aaa authorization match mine inside mine
Authorization is not supported in RADIUS
 
primary(config)# aaa authorization include any inside 0 0 0 0 mine
Warning: The keyword 'any' will be converted to 'tcp/0' in config.
Authorization is not supported in RADIUS
 
 
But, I tried a workaround where first I configured the AAA group with TACACS 
and then associated the group to the method list. After that I converted the 
TACACS group to radius and then I was able to 
download the ACLs from ACS?
 
 
 
 
With regards
Kings                                     
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live: Keep your friends up to date with what you do online.
http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_1:092010
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to