Hi Brandon

I am using 12.4 (24)T2 advsececurity.

I am using level of minimum and enrolling with url
http://x.x.x.x/cgi-bin/pkicleint.

It worked for previously with the same image.

There are two differences in my current CA config compared to that off the
working config.

One is that I have put the CDP URL and level of minimum.

I am using the CDP url that you have mentioned.

Either of one is causing the issue and I guess level is the  reason.

With regards
Kings






With regards
Kings

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Brandon Carroll <[email protected]>wrote:

> Kings,
>
> I’ve had the same issue in testing and upgrading to the T2 code solved it.
>  With me, the enrollment was successful but the tunnel failed because of the
> way the client was verifying the cert.  Another thing that I’ve seen make it
> work is setting the database level to complete on the PKI server.  I’m not
> sure why there was a difference though.  I need to test it again.
>
> Anyhow, if you are still seeing this issue what code are you running on the
> PKI server and what URL are you using to enroll the client?  Do you have the
> cdp-url configured?  What is that URL?
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Brandon Carroll - CCIE #23837
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> Mailto: [email protected]
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>
> IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (R&S,
> Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service
> Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United
> States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at
> www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *Kingsley Charles <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Sat, 6 Mar 2010 09:38:54 +0530
> *To: *Tyson Scott <[email protected]>
> *Cc: *<[email protected]>, Simon Baumann <[email protected]>,
> <[email protected]>
>
> *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Vol1, Lab 4: task 4.6 (enrolling
>  VPN-Client).
>
>
> For the past two, I am also facing the issue on my local test bed. In the
> client logs, it says something like the header is empty.
>
> It seems the server is not responding but at the same I am able to enroll
> the routers to the CA.
>
> There is some kind of bug.
>
> Why can't we do this directly using Windows?
>
>
> Open the MMC and Add a snap shot for the certification. Select Personal and
> right > All Tasks > Request New Certificate.
>
> But I have not able to go through, as it says I don't have admin rights or
> cannot contact active directory
>
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/sag_cmreqcerts.mspx?mfr=true
>
>
> After getting the cert on the windows certificate personal folder, you can
> see that in the client.
>
>
> If anyone suceeds, please let me know.
>
>
> With regards
> Kings
>
>
>
>
> With regards
> Kings
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Tyson Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Team,
>
> Our support team is in the middle of upgrading all our racks to get past
> this problem.  I believe it to be a problem with the 12.4(24)T1 code.
> 12.4(15)T9 should also be in the flash of all the routers and if you use
> that it will work fine.  I hope to have all the racks upgraded very soon.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Mailto: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]><[email protected]>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208
>
> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
> <http://www.ipexpert.com/chat> <http://www.ipexpert.com/chat>
> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>
> IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (R&S,
> Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service
> Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United
> States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at
> www.ipexpert.com/communities 
> <http://www.ipexpert.com/communities><http://www.ipexpert.com/communities> 
> and our public website at
> www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> <http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected]]<[email protected]]>
> *On Behalf Of *Badar Farooq
> *Sent:* Friday, March 05, 2010 4:31 PM
> *To:* Simon Baumann
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Vol1, Lab 4: task 4.6 (enrolling
> VPN-Client).
>
>
>
> I am also struggling with this error.
> I have checked my configuration and its otherwise sound.
> Same CA successfully issues certificates to other routers. By I cant enroll
> my VPN Client.
> I am using http://x.x.x.x/cgi-bin/pkiclient.exe as CA url in the vpn
> client config and i keep getting error 42.
> Any help will be appreciated
>
> Regards
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Simon Baumann <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> Hi,
> I got a question about task 4.6 of Lab 4. The task requires that the VPN
> Client has to enroll with R2 to obtain idendity certificate. I get "Error
> 42" on the VPN Client.
> If I got everything right, R2 doesn't have to seem and route back to the XP
> WS. So the XP WS will never be able the enroll until I set an route on R2 to
> reach the XP WS.
> Is that correct? TIA.
>
> Cheers
> Simon
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/><http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/><http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to