There is no restriction for traffic between interfaces that are in same
zone. If you define separate zones, then you need add policies using zone
pair.


(zone in) g0/1  -----router ------ g0/0 (zone out)

For Tunnel 0, lets create a GRE zone.

access-list 123 permit gre any any

class-map type inspect gre
match acces-group 123

policy-type type inspect gre
class gre
pass


zone-pair in - gre > policies to inspect traffic from inside
zone -pair gre - in > class - default with pass action
zone-pair gre - out > policy-map  gre
zone-pair out - gre > policy-map gre


For your next question, ZFW inspects IP based protocol like tcp, udp, icmp
etc.  IPSec, GRE, multicast, broadcast packets can't be inspected by ZFW.
For these, you need add a separate class-map with pass action on both
direction in-out and out-in.

That's why we use IPSec over TCP when firewall is in between.TCP will be
inspected and ISAKMP which is over UDP 500 is also inspected.





With regards
Kings




On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Sumit Mahla <[email protected]> wrote:

> And what if we want allow IPsec vpn negotiation through a zone based
> firewall..
>
> Do we need to pass the IP traffic? or esp and udp only ?
>
> kings.. could you suggest?
>
> ------------------------------
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: DMVPN and ZONE Based
> Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 17:55:55 +0530
>
>
> If implementing DMVPN on a Router enabled for Zone based config.... then do
> we require loopbacks which are advertised in the routing protocol used in
> DMVPN to be configured in some zones?
>
> i mean do the loopbacks and tunnel interface need to be member of any zone?
>
> ------------------------------
> Invest your money wisely post Budget Sign up 
> now.<http://news.in.msn.com/moneyspecial/>
> ------------------------------
> All the post budget analysis and implications Sign up 
> now.<http://news.in.msn.com/moneyspecial/budget2010/>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to