Hi, The answer is it depends. if you are using route-maps for stuff like redistribution then YES you do. Because unmatched traffic would be dropped. But for something like Policy Routing, unmatched traffic isnt dropped but it just fails over to the the regular routing table.
HTH, On 5/9/10, Sumit Mahla <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Kings, > > > > > > Even i think that we do not need a dummy for route map... but yusuf has used > it in his labs... > > > > > > > > Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 10:20:24 +0530 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Security] route-maps and vlan maps > > > Hi all > > route-maps and vlan access-maps nearly are of same architecture. > > At the end of vlan- access map, we need a dummy vlan access-map with action > forward that ensures the un-matched traffic are not blocked > > Switch(config)#vlan access-map block_arp 10 Switch > (config-access-map)#action drop > Switch (config-access-map)#match mac address ARP_Packet > Switch(config)#vlan access-map block_arp 20 > Switch (config-access-map)#action forward > > > Do we need dummy route-map entry to ensure that the unmatched are not > dropped as following: > > But, I check in my router and it seems we don't need to that dummy entry. > > route-map test permit 10 > match ip address 1 > match route-type internal > set interface Serial0 > > route-map test permit 20 > > > > > With regards > Kings > > > > With regards > Kings > _________________________________________________________________ > Bollywood This Decade > http://entertainment.in.msn.com/bollywoodthisdecade/ -- Best Regards, Tolulope. _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
