I'll by that. Be nice if the lab actually worked though. :)

Terry Little, Cisco Systems Inc. 
(425) 468-1057 (w), (425) 894-4109 (c) 
For corporate legal information go 
to:http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html 
(Sent from handheld device)

________________________________

From: Kingsley Charles <[email protected]> 
To: Terry Little (terlittl) 
Cc: CCIE Sec <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tue Jun 15 07:30:11 2010
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Yusuf Lab2 sec 5 


If you check the lab solution verification for 5.1, they are checking for "show 
uauth" O/P. Even, if the telnet connection is dropped by R2, you will still be 
having the "uauth" entry when you issue "show uauth" on context c1. Hence, it 
will be considering as working at the end of the lab.

Just a thought.


With regards
Kings


On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Terry Little (terlittl) <[email protected]> 
wrote:


        Yep that nails it on the head. My understanding is at the end of the 
lab everything is supposed to work unless it says otherwise.

         

        Terry Little

        (425) 894-4109 (m)

        (425) 468-1057 (o)

        From: Kingsley Charles [mailto:[email protected]] 
        Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 7:10 AM

        To: Terry Little (terlittl)
        Cc: CCIE Sec
        Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Yusuf Lab2 sec 5

         

        Hi Terry
        
        If you fix the route issue, then during 5.1 ASA cut-through proxy will 
work. But when you complete 7.2, the telnet will be dropped and hence 5.1 will 
be considered as incomplete. Is this what you are trying to say?
        
        
        With regards
        Kings

        On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Terry Little (terlittl) 
<[email protected]> wrote:

        Hi Kings,

         

        I found the route issue and fixed that. I have verified that the issue 
is with the NBAR config on R2 (inbetween R1 and the ASA) that causes R2 to drop 
ALL telnet from R5 and SW1. I just can’t figure out how to reconcile the the 
requirements of 5.1 and 7.2 so that both work at the same time. I can make 
either work just fine by themselves. 

         

        Anyone else have any experience with this lab that got it to work???????

         

        Terry Little

        (425) 894-4109 (m)

        (425) 468-1057 (o)

        From: Kingsley Charles [mailto:[email protected]] 
        Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:31 AM

        
        To: Terry Little (terlittl)
        Cc: CCIE Sec
        Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Yusuf Lab2 sec 5

         

        Hi Terry
        
        I did lab 2 two times. The ASA cut-through proxy verification was not 
successful. I was able to telnet but it just hanged. First time I was not able 
to find the issue but the 2nd time I found that the ASA didn't have the route 
to R1.
        
        I suspect, there is a problem in the lab as I hit it two times.
        
        
        With regards
        Kings

        On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Terry Little (terlittl) 
<[email protected]> wrote:

        Kings,

         

        Do you have any idea how to resolve this, or it really just a problem 
with the lab…i.e. ask the proctor. J

         

         

        Terry Little

        (425) 894-4109 (m)

        (425) 468-1057 (o)

        From: Kingsley Charles [mailto:[email protected]] 
        Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 9:26 AM

        
        To: Terry Little (terlittl)
        Cc: CCIE Sec
        Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Yusuf Lab2 sec 5

         

        Yes, there is some slight confusion there.
        
        
        With regards
        Kings

        On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Terry Little (terlittl) 
<[email protected]> wrote:

        I have a serious confusion concerning section 5.1 and how it interacts 
with section 7.2. 

         

        5.1 configures the ASA to authenticate telnet from R5 to R1. The 
traffic path is R5-R6-ASA1/c1-R2-R1. Ok this part is cool and works fine before 
you complete 7.2.

         

        7.2 marks all telnet traffic reaching R6 from DLCI 65, and then R2 
drops all the marked traffic. 

         

        I do NOT see how these two can coexist. Any thoughts? What am I missing?

         

        Regards,

         

        Terry Little 

        [email protected]
        Phone: +1 425 468 1057     

        Mobile: +1 425 894 4109

        Cisco Systems, Inc.

        Network Consulting Engineer
        World Wide Security Services Practice
        Cisco.com - http://www.cisco.com

         

        This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the 
sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure 
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or 
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply 
email and delete all copies of this message.
        
        For corporate legal information go to:
        http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

         

        
        _______________________________________________
        For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
please visit www.ipexpert.com

         

         

         


_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to