In my opinion Active/Active is a bad chosen term to use. I guess it´s invented by marketing people at Cisco who wanted to compete with other manufacturors of firewalls where it IS possible to load-share between different physical boxes.
Each context can only be active in one hardware at any given time. Sure, if you HAVE multiple contexts you can distribute them on different boxes. Thats it. /Jimmy 2010/6/22 Tolulope Ogunsina <[email protected]> > Hi, > No you can't. (Just like you can't have active/active redundancy with > HSRP without usung multiple groups) > > On 6/22/10, Kamran Shakil <[email protected]> wrote: > > As per study, i found that : > > > > In order to sucessfully configure Active/Active failover on 2 ASAs > > requires that you run multiple contexts on each device. If you do not > > have multiple contexts the default is Active/Standby .... > > > > BUT....my question is : > > > > > > well, my query is "is it possible to active/active in Single context > > mode???" just curious ???? > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > Kamran Shakil > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > > Tolulope. > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > -- ------- Jimmy Larsson Ryavagen 173 s-26030 Vallakra Sweden http://blogg.kvistofta.nu -------
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
