It depends on the task. With regards Kings
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Johan Bornman <[email protected]> wrote: > Is reset no the correct option? > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Yogesh Gawankar > *Sent:* 23 August 2010 10:56 AM > *To:* [email protected]; Kingsley Charles > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Vol 1 - ASA - Section 1.11 > > > > HI Kings > > > > This will drop email sent from badspammer.com but allow it to be sent to > badspammer.com. > > > > Not sure if this is what is desired. > > Thanks and regards > > Yogesh > > --- On *Mon, 8/23/10, Kingsley Charles <[email protected]>*wrote: > > > From: Kingsley Charles <[email protected]> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Vol 1 - ASA - Section 1.11 > To: [email protected] > Date: Monday, August 23, 2010, 6:51 PM > > Hi all > > Section 1.11 asks us to configure a SMTP MPF to check for domain " > badspammer.com". Since the domain keyword is present, it could refer to > either "mail-relay" or "sender's domain-name". > The solution has "sender-address regex". > > > I have put both: > > regex email "badspammer.com" > > policy-map type inspect esmtp esmtppol > parameters > mail-relay badspammar.com action drop-connection > match sender-address regex email > drop-connection > > > Please share your thoughts. > > > With regards > Kings > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
