Thanks, Kings! Much appreciated!
From: Kingsley Charles [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 06 November 2010 04:58 PM To: Johan Bornman Cc: OSL Security Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Task 7.2 The other two commands are specific to icmp and telnet which needs one way translation. The first rule with reversible option ensures the connectivity is bi-directional direction. The next hop command forces all the translated traffic by first rule to use R6 as next hop. Unless I do the lab, I can't say the reason :-) But the task doesn't seem to ask for it specifically. With regards Kings On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Johan Bornman <[email protected]> wrote: Thanks, Kings. I understand that, but why do the other 2 statics not have the rev command in, when is it necessary? From: Kingsley Charles [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 06 November 2010 03:47 PM To: Johan Bornman Cc: OSL Security Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Task 7.2 Normal static nat rules without route-maps doesn't have the option of reversible as it is always bi-directional. To make static nat rules with route-maps bi-directional, the reversible keyword is used. With regards Kings On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Johan Bornman <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, Please explain the commands in context of the task (in red): route-map R8R6 permit 10 set ip next-hop 7.56.0.6 - Why the next hop? ip nat inside source static 10.7.8.8 7.56.0.1 route-map R8ANY reversible - Why the command reversible? The other static nat's don't have it as part of the solution. Thanks Johan _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
