Basic Shell authorization is all that can be controlled locally. This task would be better suited for role based authentication.
Regards, Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: [email protected] Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kingsley Charles Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 2:59 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Command authorization with local Hi all I don't think exec and command authorization works well with local. Any thoughts? Let's say I want to allow only int g0/0 configurations only with the following: aaa authentication login king local aaa authorization exec king local aaa authorization commands 2 king local privilege exec level 2 configure terminal privilege exec level 2 configure privilege exec level 2 show running-config privilege configure level 2 interface With regards Kings
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
