I would say so. So far all lab I have done with Cisco devices required me to
do with UDP. If you have a windows VM somewhere initiating the traffic,
you'll be required to think about opening ICMP one.

That´s my understanding of the lab

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Johan Bornman <[email protected]> wrote:

> Traceroute from any cisco device will always then be the UDP type, for lab
> purposes?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Bruno [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* 19 January 2011 08:34 PM
> *To:* Johan Bornman
> *Cc:* OSL Security
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Object-Groups
>
>
>
> We have two types of traceroute. The one performed using ICMP and the one
> with UDP
>
> Windows is the guy who uses the ICMP messages for traceroute while UNIX in
> general does it by UDP
>
>
>
> The solution which covers unreachable and time-exceed is for UDP type.
>
> Who starts the traceroute, does it on the UDP range from 33434-33464. The
> response comes in format of unreachable / time-exceed
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Johan Bornman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> The task asks to allow traceroute. It’s done in an object-group. The
> solution from the DSG:
>
> object-group icmp-type TRACEROUTE
>
>      icmp-object unreachable
>
>      icmp-object time-exceeded
>
>
>
> The solution above works great, however when doing a ? I have the following
> options:
>
> ASA/ASA1a(config-icmp)# icmp-object ?
>
> <0-255>               Enter ICMP type number (0 - 255)
>
>   alternate-address
>
>   conversion-error
>
>   echo
>
>   echo-reply
>
>   information-reply
>
>   information-request
>
>   mask-reply
>
>   mask-request
>
>   mobile-redirect
>
>   parameter-problem
>
>   redirect
>
>   router-advertisement
>
>   router-solicitation
>
>   source-quench
>
>   time-exceeded
>
>   timestamp-reply
>
>   timestamp-request
>
>   traceroute
>
>   unreachable
>
>
>
> My question is about the traceroute option, will it have the same result
> if used or does it have another purpose?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Johan
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Bruno Fagioli (by Jaunty Jackalope)
> Cisco Security Professional
>



-- 
Bruno Fagioli (by Jaunty Jackalope)
Cisco Security Professional
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to