guaranteed would be the second. priority would be to make sure it get's priority on the interface.
Regards, Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: [email protected] Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Senteza Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 6:06 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Guaranteeing percentage bandwidth on interface Hi all, Another question whose optional solutions I cant decide is best, and I need your help on why I should pick one over the other. If asked that EIGRP traffic should be "guaranteed" 25 % of the interface bandwidth. I find I can configure as follows: class-map EIGRP match protocol eigrp policy-map INTF-POLICY class EIGRP priority percent 25 OR policy-map INTF-POLICY class EIGRP bandwidth percent 25 Is the difference in solutions here what the keywords "priority" and "bandwidth" achieve ? I'm confused Mark
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
