The reason it doesn't work on the sub-interface is because the 4 byte VLAN
header offsets the packet which makes the PHDF files no longer accurate.
You can recreate the PHDF files with a VLAN header field and offset the
fields to fix this.  

 

So it isn't that it doesn't work.  It is that the files aren't accurate when
you add an additional VLAN header.

 

Regards,

 

Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto:  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208
Live Assistance, Please visit:  <http://www.ipexpert.com/chat>
www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130

 

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
<http://www.ipexpert.com/communities> www.ipexpert.com/communities and our
public website at  <http://www.ipexpert.com/> www.ipexpert.com

 

From: Mark Senteza [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 8:27 PM
To: cristian venegas
Cc: Tyson Scott; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Whats wrong with this FPM?

 

Didnt know that either. Learn something everyday on this forum I'll say !!!

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 2:03 PM, cristian venegas <[email protected]>
wrote:

Tyson,

 

Excellent, thanks for the help. The physical interface worked just fine.

 

Regards

Cristian

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Tyson Scott <[email protected]> wrote:

It won't work on the sub interface.  Try it using a physical interface.

Regards,

Tyson Scott
CCIE # 13513 (R&S, Security, SP)
Managing Partner/Technical Instructor - IPexpert Inc.
[email protected]



----- Reply message -----
From: "cristian venegas" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, Feb 13, 2011 1:36 pm
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Whats wrong with this FPM?
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>

Folks,


Im doing a mini-lab to see if i understood FPM correctly. Basically, i want
to drop all web traffic. Can anybody confirm if this is correct? For some
reason its not working.

 

class-map type stack match-all cm_1
 match field IP protocol eq 6 next TCP
class-map type access-control match-all cm_2
 match field TCP dest-port eq 80
!
policy-map type access-control pm_2
 class cm_2
   log
   drop
policy-map type access-control pm_1
 class cm_1
  service-policy pm_2

!

interface FastEthernet0/0.20
 ip address 10.20.20.2 255.255.255.0
 service-policy type access-control input pm_1

 

Thanks!


Regards,

Cristian


_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> 

 


_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

 

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to