Hi,

Vol1 - Lab 2A - Task 2.2 uses ip pool...add-route to enable the inside
global addresses to be
injected into BGP. It uses two dummy pools on R2 to do this.

(Apart from lab restrictions on adding IP addresses), technically, from a
routing perspective would
secondary IP addresses on the, say, the inside interfaces add the necessary
routes to BGP?

E.g.
On R2
Two dummy pools to inject static route
ip nat pool DUMMY1 9.2.1.150 9.2.1.10 prefix 24 add-route
ip nat pool DUMMY2 9.2.13.150 9.2.13.150 prefix 24 add-route

Alternative:

int fa0/1.10
 ip address 9.2.1.2 255.255.255.0 secondary
int fa0/1.13
 ip address 9.2.13.2 255.255.255.0 secondary
!--- dummy connected routes to inject inside-globals into BGP

What do you think?

Thanks
Richard
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to