Yes, neither did I. Sorry, I read wrong. But just in case, match-all always does the work.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Kingsley Charles < [email protected]> wrote: > Not getting your point. > > With regards > Kings > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Bruno <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Here is the answer for a thread was running about if port-filter had to be >> configured with match-any or match-all >> >> SUMMARY STEPS >> >> * 1. **enable* >> >> * 2. **class-map type* *port-filter* *[**match-all** | **match-any*]* ** >> class-name* >> >> * 3. **match {closed-ports | not | ports}* >> >> As you can see, only match-all is the option >> >> -- >> Bruno Fagioli (by Jaunty Jackalope) >> Cisco Security Professional >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> > > -- Bruno Fagioli (by Jaunty Jackalope) Cisco Security Professional
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
