Hi all, Any takers on this post...?
I am trying to check my logic on NAC policies Thanks, JT On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Jim Terry <[email protected]> wrote: > > hi all, > > I am comparing the NAC solution in lab 17 5.1 where the solution is done by > condition sets but in lab 11 5.2 there are multiple policies. Does this main > that multiple policies are always ANDed? > > Thanks in advance. > > JT > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Jim Terry <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Ahh the lightbulb went off. >> >> Thank you. >> >> Jt >> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Piotr Kaluzny <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> The difference is that in this case there are 3 condition sets, each >>> containing only one element. The other way to configure this would be to >>> use only one condition set and then you would use "AND inside" and "OR >>> between". Just another way of doing things. >>> >>> Regards, >>> -- >>> Piotr Kaluzny >>> CCIE #25665 (Security), CCSP, CCNP >>> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. >>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Jim Terry <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I need assistance in understanding why the DSG says to move the radio >>>> button from And to Or? >>>> >>>> In this case dont I want ANDs inside the condition set to make sure that >>>> CTA, and XP, and version 2.0.0.30 are ALL matched? >>>> >>>> Please let me know, >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> JT >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >> > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
