Is there a reason the template/cloned access interface requires an IP address?
On 3/9/12, Fawad Khan <[email protected]> wrote: > The idea is to conserve IP addressing, because most of the time... > virtual-interface is cloned with the interface that had public address. > without unnumbered, the virtual-tempelate would require its own public IP > address. > > FNK > > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Joe Astorino > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> This might be a silly question, but I'm having a hard time wrapping my >> head around why in most EZ-VPN remote examples the virtual-template >> interface is usually configured with "ip unnumbered lo0" or similar. >> Is there a reason for this configuration? Does the virtual-access >> tunnel interface that gets cloned from the virtual-template require an >> IP address or something? >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Joe Astorino >> CCIE #24347 >> http://astorinonetworks.com >> >> "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> > -- Sent from my mobile device Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 http://astorinonetworks.com "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
