Thanks, Joe. I'm wondering if we have a similar task on the lab would its wording bear at least a hint on what and how to do it? I'm still confused with policing and rate-limiting.
Eugene From: Joe Astorino [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 16 April 2012 07:05 To: Eugene Pefti Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Policy-map definition for traffic policing Two different ways to do the same thing. The police cir syntax gives you the capability to implement a dual rate policer if you want to (PIR), but in the way you have it implemented police and police cir are both implementing a single rate, 3 color policer. On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Eugene Pefti <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Is there any difference between these two policy-map definitions in terms of functionality of course? policy-map HTTP-PM class HTTP-CM police cir 128000 bc 3200 be 4800 conform-action set-prec-transmit 1 exceed-action set-prec-transmit 0 violate-action drop And policy-map HTTP-PM class HTTP-CM police 128000 3200 4800 conform-action set-prec-transmit 1 exceed-action set-prec-transmit 0 violate-action drop I've tried moving files between two routers while policing traffic on one router interface and didn't see any hits on policy-map counters. Eugene _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com> -- Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 http://astorinonetworks.com "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
