Gents I am sorry about this episode that we are having here in this thread. It could be the time of month :) makes me laugh that I am being demanded to provide my number. I think I should post my plague once I receive it.
There won't be any more reply from my side on this topic. I am sorry again. On Tuesday, June 5, 2012, Elizabeth .... wrote: > Well, what a waist of time & space to discuss with you ... What's your > CCIE number, that you can really prove that you'd passed the Lab!!!! > > Please do not replay!!! > > Regards, > Elizabeth > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:17:29 -0400 > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Blocking flood attack on an interface > From: [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');> > To: [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');> > CC: [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');> > > It's not my comments which are abusive. Its yours and It's you who is > ignorant and probably jealous as well. A lot of ppl on this forum know me > personally and virtually and they know what I meant by comments. Keep your > retardness to yourself and Bring something useful to this forum. Iam on > this forum for sometime and am trying to work with various people to make > it better. When you have no idea what others meant then keep your reply to > your self. Visit various pathetic forums and see what those wanna bees are > discussing. > Goto Cisco website and see where Cisco announced about v4 and then see the > comment of user who asked, "how many 'lab' in this new version 4" > Do you have any idea what hat user was asking about? You wouldn't know I > bet. > Enough said. > > On Tuesday, June 5, 2012, Elizabeth .... wrote: > > Fawad, > > No need for your abusive commends.... > It's been just 5 - 6 days since you passed your exam, and now what are you > such an expert .... > So, if you do not have respect for others, maybe it would be better that > you abstain for posting on this forum!!! > > Regards, > Elizabeth > > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 09:37:55 -0400 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Blocking flood attack on an interface > > A lot depends on the question. It would be mentioned in he question how to > resolve it, there would be some clear hints. > Don't believe on the answers posted on the forums for floating questions. > A lot of those wanna bees are pretty down low in technology and they are > just posting anything that would come to their mind. > > On Tuesday, June 5, 2012, Kingsley Charles wrote: > > Not ACL but some interface command should be the answer. I just saw this > question floating... > > With regards > Kings > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Matt Hill <[email protected]> wrote: > > Off the top of my head... An ACL with the broadcast address as the > destination? (???) > > Cheers, > Matt > > CCIE #22386 > CCSI #31207 > > On 5 June 2012 18:03, Kingsley Charles <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all > > > > How do we block smurf attacks on an interface other than using "no ip > > directed-broadcast"? I can't think of any other commands. > > > > > > With regards > > Kings > > > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > > -- > FNK > > _______________________________________________ For more information > regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit > www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > -- > FNK > -- FNK
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
