Hi Mike. I would mark it as "ask the proctor" question. In task 1.1 they do say "map physical interface names to logical names" and table 7.1 supports it. So I reckon your solution is correct (column 2).
HTH A. On 9 July 2012 12:43, Mike Rojas <[email protected]> wrote: > Experts, > > Yusuf Lab1 debrief for multiple context verification, when it says that > you need to check the show nameif, it appears like this: > > ASA1/abc1(config)# sh nameif > Interface Name Security > Ethernet0/3 inside 100 > Ethernet0/0 outside 0 > ASA1/abc1(config)# > > > However, in my configuration, it appears as: > > ASA1/abc1(config)# sh nameif > Interface Name Security > outside outside 0 > inside inside 100 > ASA1/abc1(config)# > > > Two questions, does the order matter? > Second question, In the configuration or the tasks, it didnt say that the > interface needed to be visible, however in the solution appears the > interface instead of the configured virtual name, is the solution > incorrect? > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
