OK, thanks all for the feedback

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Kingsley Charles <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Use IP address, when they have mentioned the IP Address. For example, if
> want to inspect ftp on port 2121, it's better to use ACE.
>
> Remove the default inspection, put this custom class matching port 2121
> with ACL and then below that put default class map.
>
> Now both normal ftp traffic and on port 2121 is inspected.
>
> Ports can be used but they are open to any address.
>
>
>
> With regards
> Kings
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Ben Shaw <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> I am jsut doing some practice on protocol inspection using MPF on ASA. I
>> am generally using ACLs to match my traffic in my L3/L4 class maps though
>> at times the answers I see match just on the port number.
>>
>> Apart from being able to define source and destination IP addresses in
>> ACLs as compared to matching just on a port number in a class map, are
>> there any deeper benefits to matching on one or the other when using MPF,
>> especially in regards to then implementing L7 application inspection? Below
>> is what I mean:
>>
>> Option 1
>> access-list http-out extended permit tcp any any eq http log
>> class-map http-outside
>>  match access-list http-out
>>
>> Option 2
>> class-map http-outside
>>  match port eq 80
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ben
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to