This is a very easy concept, the answer is yes...

Look for RPF check... U need to be careful that there are no asymmetric nat 
rules.


Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 19, 2012, at 10:19 AM, "Joe Astorino" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Nobody?
> 
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Joe Astorino <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> So in 8.2 code we had this concept of nat-control that when enabled
>> required a nat translation from higher to lower security level
>> interfaces.  Fine, no problems.  When we disable this feature via "no
>> nat-control" we no longer have that requirement.  One caveat to that
>> is that apparently even with nat-control disabled, if you enable
>> dynamic nat/pat on an interface then you must either nat or bypass nat
>> for all traffic sourced from the addresses in the dynamic nat.
>> 
>> Specifically, in the configuration guide "Even with NAT control
>> disabled, you need to perform NAT on any addresses for which you
>> configure dynamic NAT"
>> 
>> Now, I have a question.  Does this apply to dynamic outside NAT, and
>> specifically dynamic outside policy nat?  The config guide states
>> "Similarly, if you enable outside dynamic NAT or PAT, then all outside
>> traffic must match a NAT rule when it accesses an inside interface."
>> but does not mention anything about dynamic policy outside NAT.
>> 
>> I ask because I see the following happening.  I have nat-control disabled.
>> 
>> ASA# sh run | i nat|global
>> global (inside) 1 192.168.10.88-192.168.10.92 netmask 255.255.255.248
>> global (inside) 1 192.168.10.93
>> global (inside) 1 192.168.10.94
>> nat (outside) 1 access-list DYNAMIC_POLICY_NAT outside
>> 
>> This configuration works great -- traffic matching the ACL
>> "DYNAMIC_POLICY_NAT" is dynamic NAT' to the pool.  When the pool is
>> exhausted traffic is NAT/PAT.  However, everything continues to work.
>> In other words, traffic originating on the outside interface passes
>> through to the inside interface with no NAT rule or NAT exemption
>> configured.  Is this the expected behavior?
>> 
>> Thank You!
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Joe Astorino
>> CCIE #24347
>> http://astorinonetworks.com
>> 
>> "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Joe Astorino
> CCIE #24347
> http://astorinonetworks.com
> 
> "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to