Sorry I'm typing this from a red light. Good luck on your next attempt!! Plenty of food choices in SJ (:
-Steve On Tuesday, February 19, 2013, Jay McMickle wrote: > SJC. > > I've been making my own labs with new items from the blueprint in addition > to what was on v3. I picked up another vendor's workbooks (the only one > with them out right now) and I've already labbed 15 hours this week (work > is allowing me to do this at home). I'm back at my old routine again- > 35-40 hours a week. At this rate, I'll be done with this 2,000 page > workbook in 4 weeks. > > FlexVPN and DMVPNv3 have been eating my lunch, but ISE isn't bad after > taking a bootcamp and implement it at work. WLC on the other hand has been > tricky. > > Just another month or so- I'll take a swing. > > PS- I'll never go back to RTP. Not just because I failed Security v3 > there, but the food alone is enough to make anyone want to quit labbing! > Proctor was awesome, but I don't like my food in a community bowl wrapped > in plastic. SJC it is. > > Regards, > Jay McMickle- CCIE #35355 (RS) > Sent from my iPhone 5 > Support me to fight MS! > > http://main.nationalmssociety.org/site/TR/Bike/TXHBikeEvents?px=5886043&pg=personal&fr_id=20226 > > > On Feb 19, 2013, at 9:48 PM, Steve Di Bias <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jay, SJ or RTP? What preparation materials have you been using for version > 4? > > Thanks, > Steve Di Bias- CCIE #32840 > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Jay McMickle <[email protected]>wrote: > > LOVE that command! > > Now, if Cisco would take our recommendation for the priority command, I > would be a happy camper! Have you ever wondered why the "failover LAN unit > primary" doesn't have a priority command like GLBP or HSRP? We meet each > year and remind them. :? > > PS- (Steve)- I'm closing in on my first attempt to Security version 4. > Should be by the end of March. > > Regards, > Jay McMickle- CCIE #35355 (RS) > Sent from my iPhone 5 > Support me to fight MS! > > http://main.nationalmssociety.org/site/TR/Bike/TXHBikeEvents?px=5886043&pg=personal&fr_id=20226 > > > On Feb 19, 2013, at 6:54 PM, Steve Di Bias <[email protected]> wrote: > > Of course, but please don't misunderstand me here. All I'm saying is that > if your ASA get's hacked not having an TELNET/SSH client isn't going to > save you... > > So as to end this discussion I really only cared about having TELNET/SSH > clients for troubleshooting purposes only. > > I can assure you that I could really care less about having embedded > TELNET/SSH clients in versions 8.4 and beyond, thanks to tcp ping! > > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa84/command/reference/p.html#wp2133619 > > > With this ability the need for embedded clients has diminished > > ping tcp 1.1.1.1 3389 > > Happy studies > > > Thanks, > Steve Di Bias- CCIE #32840 > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:36 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > By that logic is not necessary to encrypt passwords or pre-shared keys > stored in the running configuration. Remember that security is a layered > approach, and involves vigilance wherever possible. > > Sent via mobile. > > On Feb 19, 2013, at 6:58 PM, Steve Di Bias <[email protected]> wrote: > > Assuming someone hacks into your ASA, having an embedded SSH client would > be the least of your worries > > On Tuesday, February 19, 2013, Piotr Matusiak wrote: > > This is NOT missing feature. There is no TELNET/SSH client for purpose. > I wouldn't like my ASA become a hop point to the rest of my network if > someones breaks in. > > Regards, > Piotr > > > On 2/19/13 10:45 PM, Jimmy Larsson wrote: > > That has annoyed me since forever as well... > > http://nat0.net/another-missing-asa-feature-telnet-and-ssh-client/ > > Best regards > Jimmy > > > 2013/2/19 cisco 2006 <[email protected]> > > -- Thanks, Steve Di Bias- CCIE #32840
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
