Joe Auto-NAT is for simple source translations and/or redirection. Manual NAT is what you have to use when you want to add some policy/conditions to the equation, like when you want to only translate packets going to a particular destination
Regards, -- Piotr Kaluzny CCIE #25665 (Security), CCSP, CCNP Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Joe Astorino <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi guys, > > Just starting down the road of the new ASA NAT. I have a simple question. > I see there are 2 ways you can do dynamic PAT > > 1) Auto NAT > > object network obj_any > subnet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 > nat (inside,outside) dynamic interface > > 2) Manual NAT > > nat (inside,outside) source dynamic any interface > > > Any preference as to which one and why? Most examples I see are > referencing the auto NAT method for this purpose. I know manual NAT is > ahead of auto NAT from a precedence stand point, just wondering why one > might use one or the other? > > Sigh...I miss the old way > > -- > Regards, > > Joe Astorino > CCIE #24347 > http://astorinonetworks.com > > "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
