Hjji

On Tuesday, March 18, 2014, <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Send CCIE_Security mailing list submissions to
>         [email protected] <javascript:;>
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_security
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         [email protected] <javascript:;>
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         [email protected] <javascript:;>
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Security digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Strange DMVPN Issue (Bastien Migette)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:45:15 +0100
> From: Bastien Migette <[email protected] <javascript:;>>
> To: Garrett Skjelstad <[email protected] <javascript:;>>
> Cc: "[email protected] <javascript:;>"
>         <[email protected] <javascript:;>>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Strange DMVPN Issue
> Message-ID:
>         <
> cakmgict9lh2ohmyaew4-7t5ajlejuj7kb8xh0voklat0kaj...@mail.gmail.com<javascript:;>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi Garett,
>
> THe thing is I don't see any difference in the identities between the 2
> debugs, that is why I found strange.
> Maybe more verbose debugs would have shown something...
>
>
> 2014-03-16 16:23 GMT+01:00 Garrett Skjelstad 
> <[email protected]<javascript:;>
> >:
>
> > It didn't start accepting them, R5 simply started giving the correct
> > identity after the clear.
> >
> > This is common.
> >
> > Sent from my (old) iPhone5
> >
> > On Mar 16, 2014, at 3:54, Bastien Migette 
> > <[email protected]<javascript:;>
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I was playing with DMVPN lab from WB1 (Section 7 - DMVPN Phase 1) and got
> > this strange behaviour.
> >
> > Basically after configuring everything fine, R6 Tunnel was up, but R5
> kept
> > being down.
> >
> > Debug IPSEC on R8 was giving:
> >
> > *Mar 16 10:34:18.200: IPSEC(validate_proposal_request): proposal part #1
> > *Mar 16 10:34:18.200: IPSEC(validate_proposal_request): proposal part #1,
> >   (key eng. msg.) INBOUND local= 192.168.8.8:0, remote= 8.9.50.5:0,
> >     local_proxy= 8.9.2.8/255.255.255.255/47/0,
> >     remote_proxy= 8.9.50.5/255.255.255.255/47/0,
> >     protocol= ESP, transform= NONE  (Transport-UDP),
> >     lifedur= 0s and 0kb,
> >     spi= 0x0(0), conn_id= 0, keysize= 0, flags= 0x0
> > *Mar 16 10:34:18.200: map_db_find_best did not find match
> > *Mar 16 10:34:18.200: IPSEC(ipsec_process_proposal): proxy identities not
> > supported
> >
> > R6 was having exact same config except tunnel ip address of course.
> >
> > Then I did a clear crypto session on R5, and it suddenly started to work:
> > *Mar 16 10:34:51.776: IPSEC(key_engine): got a queue event with 1 KMI
> > message(s)
> > *Mar 16 10:34:51.800: IPSEC(validate_proposal_request): proposal part #1
> > *Mar 16 10:34:51.800: IPSEC(validate_proposal_request): proposal part #1,
> >   (key eng. msg.) INBOUND local= 192.168.8.8:0, remote= 8.9.50.5:0,
> >     local_proxy= 8.9.2.8/255.255.255.255/47/0,
> >     remote_proxy= 8.9.50.5/255.255.255.255/47/0,
> >     protocol= ESP, transform= NONE  (Transport-UDP),
> >     lifedur= 0s and 0kb,
> >     spi= 0x0(0), conn_id= 0,
> > R8(config)#keysize= 0, flags= 0x0
> > *Mar 16 10:34:51.800: insert of map into mapdb AVL failed, map + ace pair
> > already exists on the mapdb
> > *Mar 16 10:34:51.800: Crypto mapdb : proxy_match
> >         src addr     : 192.168.8.8
> >         dst addr     : 8.9.50.5
> >         protocol     : 47
> >         src port     : 0
> >         dst port     : 0
> >
> >
> > I am a bit curious though on why clearing crypto session on R5 would have
> > made R8 accepting proxy IDs.
> >
> > This is on
> > R8(config)#do sh ver | i IO
> > Cisco IOS Software, C2900 Software (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version
> > 15.2(4)M5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
> > R8(config)#
> >
> >
> >
> > I removed the EZVPN Config from previous task as well, not sure that
> would
> > made a difference.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
> >
> > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> </archives/ccie_security/attachments/20140318/b9323c1b/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
>
> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>
> End of CCIE_Security Digest, Vol 93, Issue 6
> ********************************************
>
_______________________________________________
Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Reply via email to