Hey guys,
I just tried on a 6500 with 12.2(33)SRC4, and my test with sitemap doesn't
set the SoO when BGP is used PE-CE.
interface GigabitEthernet3/3
vrf forwarding INTERNET
mtu 9000
ip vrf sitemap TEST
ip address x.x.x.21 255.255.255.252
xxx-PE-A-209#sho route-map TEST
route-map TEST, permit, sequence 10
Match clauses:
Set clauses:
extended community SoO:210:9999
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
After clearing BGP:
xxx-PE-A-209#sho ip bgp vpnv4 vrf INTERNET x.x.x.x
BGP routing table entry for x.x.x:x:x.x.x.x/32, version 37
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table INTERNET)
Flag: 0x820
Advertised to update-groups:
1 2
(210)
x.x.x.x from x.x.x.x (x.x.x.x)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, confed-external, best
Community: 210:210
Extended Community: RT:210:210
mpls labels in/out 39/nolabel
I wonder if it is hw/model specific...6500s are not on the lab, but in any
case, kind of interesting.
Bryan Bartik
CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:35 PM, jnprbill <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Bryan -
>
> Dev pinged me offline to let me know that sitemap worked for BGP as a PE-CE
> protocol. He was using 12.2(25)S9 on 7200 as well as on 3600 12.3.
> There's been some conflicting information out there and quite a lot that
> says sitemap doesn't work for BGP. After I sent my first message, I had
> thought I was wrong about using sitemap for BGP and was confused about
> EIGRP. I'll try to get the bottom of this. I'm sure we're right and wrong
> at the same time. Someone must have found a version of IOS where sitemap
> isn't intended to work for BGP or maybe someone found a bug. I suppose that
> as long we know both options it might not really matter for the lab exam.
>
> Thanks
>
> Bill - JNCIE #119, CCIE #7258
>
--
