Well, I should turn in my digits then, for I am equally at loss as you are :-)
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:37, karim okasha <[email protected]> wrote: > Lower and it didn't have and effect. > > I made the RD of the other route higher and this also didn't work. > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> This is slowly but surely beginning to annoy me :-). >> >> When you changed the RD just before, did you change it to be >> numerically higher or lower than the other one? >> >> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:29, karim okasha <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Dear Marko, >> > >> > VRF configuration on R8: >> > ! >> > ip vrf sp1000 >> > rd 1000:8 >> > route-target export 1000:1000 >> > route-target import 1000:1000 >> > ! >> > >> > VRF Configuration on R2: >> > ! >> > ip vrf sp1000 >> > rd 1000:2 >> > route-target export 1000:1000 >> > route-target import 1000:1000 >> > ! >> > >> > VRF configuration on R3: >> > >> > ! >> > ip vrf sp1000 >> > rd 1000:3 >> > route-target export 1000:1000 >> > route-target import 1000:1000 >> > ! >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:22, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Can you post the output of the "sp1000" RF definition, with all >> >> > import >> >> > and export statements on R8, please? >> >> >> >> VRF definition :-) >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
