Force is better option in my opinion as you may add more loopbacks on your routers later in the lab.
Also rib failure is fine unless cisco says something specifically. STM-4 or facts like this one should be aware of as wan engineers but I am pretty sure cisco will provide you those values. On Tuesday, December 29, 2009, srinivas pv <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > I am about to complete lab 8 and this lab is good. I have few general > queries. Please do the needful. > - We need to configure OSPF autocost reference bandwidth for STM-4. > If we know bandwidth for STM-4 (or something similar), we can configure > autocost reference bandwidth. In case in the exam, if we don't know the > STM-4 bandwidth, how can we identify it? Will proctor helpful here? I tried > to find in doccd, but could not find. > > - Sometimes, of iBGP, if the loopback is learnt by IGP, we will get RIB > failure, and we can still advertise to peer AS.r>i125.125.125.2/32 > 125.125.125.2 0 100 0 ? <<<<< at first r > > Is it ok to leave this rib failure as such? > - For 'mpls ldp router-id', is it better to use 'force' even though the > question didn't mentions. > Thanks,Srinivas > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
