HI Venkat, This was the route-map which was used for dampening. I did not use any route-map to suppress or filter any prefixes.
router bgp x bgp dampening route-map xxx Cheers, Matt CCIE #22386 CCSI #31207 On 8 March 2010 15:12, venkat <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Doesn't the deny statement in route-map denies those prefixes from > advertisement to neighbor. I haven't tested this, but I believe those > deny statement will not allow those matched prefix to get advertised. > > On 3/8/10, Matt Hill <[email protected]> wrote: >> Gday... >> >> This section asks us to make a route-map and assign various dampening >> parameters based on different prefix lengths. ie >/24 do x, /22-23 do >> y and <21 do z. >> >> It also stipulates that certain prefixes must not be dampened at all. >> >> In the route-map, the "do not dampen ranges" have this in the Proctor Guide: >> >> route-map DAMP permit 10 >> match ip address prefix-list xxx >> route-map DAMP permit 20 >> match ip address prefix-list yyy >> set dampening ... etc >> >> now... for my answer, I entered: >> >> route-map DAMP deny 10 >> match ip address prefix-list xxx >> route-map DAMP permit 20 >> match ip address prefix-list yyy >> set dampening etc... >> >> Now... is there any reason why my deny wont work? I mean I am telling >> the router to dampen according to a route-map. If I deny in my >> route-map, wont it simply _not_ apply dampening to those prefixes? >> >> Cheers, >> Matt >> >> CCIE #22386 >> CCSI #31207 >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
