Jeferson. Very subtle... CONGRATULATIONS!
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeferson Guardia Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 6:04 PM To: Max Pierson Cc: Smail Milak; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] To give up CCIE SP and change to R/S? Last year I considered SEVERAL times changing from R&S to SP... here is my R&S number #28157 Dont EVER give up on your dreams/goals. Keep it up! 2011/2/20 Max Pierson <[email protected]> > >But I have more experience in enterprise-like network designs. > > Completely opposite for me. I've been in the SP world for 10+ years, and > I fortunately have access to gear that runs XR, XE, NX. I can see this > being > a problem soon for folks on the new SP track though. Will be interesting to > see how the Certification community deals with the changes (hopefully Cisco > will provide some help). I can attest, the gear is beyond expensive, so a > EMU is almost gonna be a must. Guess I have no excuses for not going SP > track when I finally pass the R&S :) > > Max > > > > On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:14 PM, BNM <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Smail, > > > > I somehow agree with you. Im pretty much in the same dilemma - well used > > to... > > R&S has quite a good representation and given the fact that 4.0 covers > > MPLS, > > I actually think its worth the effort. > > In my opinion if you have CCNP, CCDP and other enterprise certs and > > experience, 'digging deeper' into it shud be interesting. I have strong > > interest in SP too. > > But I have more experience in enterprise-like network designs. > > So I need a smooth transition into CCIEville before I can harness > > everything > > else it can offer. > > Tyson and team seem to have everything for everyone though!! :P > > > > At the end of the day, it just depend on your interest and passion. > > > > All the best. Please comment guys, I want this number too!! > > > > On 21 February 2011 05:43, Smail Milak <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I checked the SP blueprint a few times and I think that it will be > pretty > > > hard to study some topics like Packet over SONET, 10GE and VPLS without > > the > > > hardware, Plus it is not known to me when IPX will update their books. > > > > > > Is it smart to change to R/S? I have already the IPX SP books. Until > now > > I > > > covered only the IGPs, BGP, Multicast and MPLS TE. > > > In the last three months I have not learned for CCIE SP because I had > to > > > learn for some other certs (CCNA Sec, CCDA and CCDP). In 1-2 Months I > > will > > > hopefuly have my CCDP. > > > > > > I took a look at the R/S blueprint. It looks interesting and I think > that > > I > > > will rather encounter the R/S topics than the SP ones in my job. > > > > > > These are my arguments for a change to R/S: > > > > > > - No High-end hardware needed > > > - Bigger online community > > > - Topics are more real world than the SP topics (in my job) > > > - Cisco 360 Learning program (I dont know if the IPX courses are > better, > > or > > > cheaper) > > > > > > What do you guys think? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please > > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ------------------------------------ > > "Life is complex, it has a real part and an imaginary part." > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > -- Jeferson Guardia CCIE #28157 _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
