It create issues with partial PRI's... Use ccm-manager config on BR1 ,
put BR1 under SRST, keep in SRST and reload ur router, you will see what
happens..


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 9 September 2008 11:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 31, Issue 52

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: IPCC - Agent in "Reserved State" (Ricardo Arevalo)
   2. MGCP Gateway: ccm-manager config (Robertico Gonzalez)
   3. Re: MGCP Gateway: ccm-manager config (Jonathan Charles)
   4. Re: IPCC - Agent in "Reserved State" (Jonathan Charles)
   5. Test / Verification plan (Michael Shavrov)
   6. Easy way to find module numbers (Paul and Bobs)
   7. Re: Easy way to find module numbers (Michael Shavrov)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 12:38:57 -0400
From: "Ricardo Arevalo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCC - Agent in "Reserved State"
To: "o Ninja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Did you check the CSS applied to CTI ports?

Sometimes, when the agent goes to reserved state and the goes back to
queue,
its a CSS problem.

//r.a.

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:33 PM, o Ninja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The timers are the same, I did not change any value.
>
> The phone rings showing that the agent is "reserved" but for some
reason it
> does not "connect" after that the call goes to the queue.
>
> When the phone is ringing I do not see the Calling ID, I just see
> reserved in the phone?s display.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Receba GR?TIS as mensagens do Messenger no seu celular quando voc?
estiver
> offline. Conhe?a o MSN Mobile! Crie j? o
seu!<http://mobile.live.com/signup/signup2.aspx?lc=pt-br>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080908/8ae
f7495/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 14:50:54 -0600
From: "Robertico Gonzalez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Gateway: ccm-manager config
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi,

I have in my notes that it is not recommended to use the MGCP
ccm-manager
config and ccm-manager config server commands.  I always use these
commands
in my lab and I can't recall the reason the instructor said that it was
a
bad idea to use these commands.  Does somebody remember why the
instructor
made that recommendation?

I have some notes saying that these commands would enter 24 timeslots
instead of 3 timeslots in the pri-group command.  But that doesn't seem
to
be a big deal (just change that command).

Thanks,
-rg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080908/274
98957/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:04:57 -0500
From: "Jonathan Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Gateway: ccm-manager config
To: "Robertico Gonzalez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Right and the next time you reset the gateway, it will change it back.

However, you can busy out the remaining channels with B-channel
maintenance
status... So, you can accomplish the same thing and still have MGCP push
a
config.



Jonathan

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Robertico Gonzalez <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have in my notes that it is not recommended to use the MGCP
ccm-manager
> config and ccm-manager config server commands.  I always use these
commands
> in my lab and I can't recall the reason the instructor said that it
was a
> bad idea to use these commands.  Does somebody remember why the
instructor
> made that recommendation?
>
> I have some notes saying that these commands would enter 24 timeslots
> instead of 3 timeslots in the pri-group command.  But that doesn't
seem to
> be a big deal (just change that command).
>
> Thanks,
> -rg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080908/10d
c01f0/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:10:10 -0500
From: "Jonathan Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCC - Agent in "Reserved State"
To: "o Ninja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

This is a problem (see the tech note...) with a script (possibly)

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/custcosw/ps1846/products_tech_not
e09186a0080262545.shtml

Or, it could be that your CTI Ports do not have CSS visability to the
agent
DN partitions, so, via CTI it put the agent in reserved and then
attempts to
transfer the call and fails... then it goes back into the queue.... and
the
agent is made not ready.



Jonathan

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:17 AM, o Ninja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Hello All,
>
> I am having the following problem in my customer:
>
> The problem was that, after I place a call to the RP on IPCC, a call
goes
> to the agent and then the agent goes to "reserved state", after that
the
> call goes to the queue, after the delay inside the queue, the call
goes
> again to the agent and then the same problem happen.
>
> Thanks in advance !
>
> Silvio
>
> ------------------------------
> Conhe?a j? o Windows Live Spaces, o site de relacionamentos do
Messenger! Crie
> j? o seu! <http://www.amigosdomessenger.com.br>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080908/55e
a6d79/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 20:41:21 -0400
From: "Michael Shavrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Test / Verification plan
To: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Everyone,

What strategy do you use to verify your jub after you completed the
configuration steps? Sure, some stuff is easy to verify, like NTP
status, infrastructure or components status. But what about dial plan?
How do you verify that all dialing work in every situation, and what
does not work?

In general, we have the following "dialing destinations":

hq -> br1
hq -> br2
br1 -> hq
..
hq -> pstn 911
hq -> pstn local
..
hq -> teho
..
hq -> unity
br1 -> unity
hq -> br1 -> unity
..
hq -> br2 aa
hq -> br2 -> cue
..
etc.

Basically we have a good hundred dialing combinations we may (need???)
test. And this is just for the case, when everything works (all links
up, PSTN available, there is enough bandwidth, etc.). 

Now let's talk about "situations":

1. All Good
2. WAN down (could be all links or selective links) (to verify SRST)
3. PSTN down (to verify backup)
4. GK down (as variant, not enough bandwidth).
5. CallManager CAC (to verify AAR)
etc.

So, basically we are speaking about a couple hundreds numbers to dial.
How could we optimize this process? What should we test, and what should
we skip? Does anyone knows how (may be not exactly) proctor tests your
job? Understood, tht probably he has some scripts, which will, for
example, turn on certain debug commands, and then do something like
"csim start" with required numbers. But what should we do to maximize
our confidence?

Good luck everyone,

Mike
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080908/111
130a8/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 11:26:28 +1000
From: "Paul and Bobs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Easy way to find module numbers
To: "Jonathan Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Does anyone know of an easier way to find out what module is plugged
into
what slot on the gateway besides

show diag and sho ver
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080908/4df
2d7aa/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 21:42:31 -0400
From: "Michael Shavrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Easy way to find module numbers
To: "Paul and Bobs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,        "Jonathan Charles"
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

"show diag" provides most detailed information. There is the command
"show inventory", but it shows cards information without actual slot
inserted. 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Paul and Bobs 
  To: Jonathan Charles 
  Cc: [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 9:26 PM
  Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Easy way to find module numbers


  Does anyone know of an easier way to find out what module is plugged
into what slot on the gateway besides

  show diag and sho ver


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080908/eda
1cf35/attachment.html

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CCIE_Voice mailing list
[email protected]
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice


End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 31, Issue 52
******************************************

Reply via email to