Thanks Everyone! That was it.
Scott Hardesty | Cisco Engineer | MidAtlantic | Presidio Networked Solutions 7601 Ora Glen Drive, Suite 100, Greenbelt, MD 20770 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] D: 301.313.2041 | C: 443.789.1219 | http://www.presidio.com/ -----Original Message----- From: Devildoc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 9/12/2008 11:45 AM To: Hardesty, Scott; [email protected] Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QOS Question Scott, CBWFQ only works for the output queue on the router. It does not work for the input queue. Your statements "class class-default" and "fair-queue" in the policy-map voice configured the CBWFQ. For marking purposes only, you mustn't put those 2 statements in your policy-map. You must remove them for the marking policy to work properly. You use those 2 statements when you try to configure LLQ. JD > Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:39:59 -0400 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QOS Question > > I am trying to mark all of my rtp and control traffic at the WAN edge router > and not trust the LAN. The issue I am having is that when I try to apply the > service-policy to the ingress Ethernet Interface I get the following error. I > have tried applying this to the sub-interface as well as the physical > interface with the same result. I am assuming I am using the wrong technique > to make this happen. Pertinent parts of the configuration are listed below. > Any help would be GREATLY appreciated. thx. > > "CBWFQ : Can be enabled as an output feature only" > > > class-map match-all CONTROL > match access-group name CONTROL > class-map match-all RTP > match access-group name RTP > ! > ! > policy-map VOICE > class RTP > set dscp ef > class CONTROL > set dscp cs3 > class class-default > fair-queue > > ===================== ACTUAL ERROR FROM COMMAND================= > > BR2(config-if)#service-policy input VOICE > CBWFQ : Can be enabled as an output feature only > > > > > > Scott Hardesty | Cisco Engineer | MidAtlantic | Presidio Networked Solutions > 7601 Ora Glen Drive, Suite 100, Greenbelt, MD 20770 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > D: 301.313.2041 | C: 443.789.1219 | http://www.presidio.com/ > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thu 9/11/2008 7:40 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 31, Issue 72 > > Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Unity error question (Jeff BCI) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:47:35 -0500 > From: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity error question > To: "'Kumar, Narinder'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, OSL Group > <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain > > Just noticed something else interesting. > > When Unity doesn't answer the call after 4 rings, then that Unity port > unregisters in CUCM and the call continues to ring over to the next Unity > port. > > For instance, Unity port 1 is being hit first. After 4 rings, the call goes > to Unity port 2 and Unity port 1 unregisters. Now it rings off of port 2 and > goes to port 3, now Unity port 2 unregisters in CUCM. > > The only way to recover this is to reboot Unity to get all Unity voice ports > to re-register, but still Unity refuses to answer any call. > > -Jeff > > Lost in Unity-Land > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff BCI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 8:28 PM > To: 'Kumar, Narinder'; OSL Group > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity error question > > > Well, after completely rebuilding Unity from scratch, I have the exact same > problem. The rebuild was necessary to move it to a new domain, changing > partner server alone didn't work. > > Anyhow, the event log says > > "Cisco Unity-TSP; TSP device 5 (Cisco Unity port 2) disconnected > from Call Manager x.x.x.x. If there are many of these in sequence > from the same device 5, this port may not be functioning anymore. > Check to see that it is answering calls, and the server may need > to be restarted to activate the port again." > > UTIM shows proper integration, all unity ports in CUCM are registered, > licensing is correct and validated, hunt list is good, everything seems to > be proper except that the VM ports just simply won't answer the call. Call > Viewer doesn't even show the call hitting Unity. After 4 rings from the > phone after the call goes to unity, I get fast busy. > > Never seen this before at all, and I have to get this fixed quickly if I am > to be ready for my Oct 8th lab date. > > Any ideas? All Unity services are running, no errors in event log indicating > that a service croaked. > > Thanks, Jeff > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kumar, Narinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 11:52 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity error question > > > As Chris suggested check the event log see if any clue or service is > failing. Also go through the service may be some critical services are > not running... > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2008 1:28 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 31, Issue 66 > > Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Unity error question (Chris Parker) > 2. Re: Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs (Michael Gross) > 3. Re: Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs (Michael Gross) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:09:40 -0400 > From: Chris Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity error question > To: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, OSL Group > <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Check the event log on the unity server. Check to see if any new events > appear when your call fails. That should give you some kind of idea > whats going on. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 11:58 PM > To: OSL Group <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity error question > > regardless if I dial the pilot number directly, or call ip phone to ip > phone, or pstn inbound to the site, the results are the same. Calls do > indeed go to Unity as desired, but unity rings 4 times then I get a fast > busy. > > I've checked the UTIM, its fine, Unity ports are registered and verified > in > UTIM, even rebooted Unity and same result. > > Thanks, Jeff > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kumar, Narinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 10:38 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity error question > > > Jeff, > What happen when you call the unity pilot number direct. > Try calling it from IP phone and pstn phone do you get the same results > when unanswered call is forwarded to unity. > > Narinder > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2008 12:23 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 31, Issue 63 > > Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs (Jeff BCI) > 2. Re: Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs (Jeff BCI) > 3. Unity error question (Jeff BCI) > 4. QoS for locally generated traffic (Kumar, Narinder) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:18:16 -0500 > From: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > To: 'Mike O' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > My lab is configured so that the HQ gateway serves as the frame switch > to > Branch 1 and Branch 2 using crossover T-1 cables. > > -Jeff > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike O [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 10:02 PM > To: Michael Gross > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > > > In my lab I have: 3825(PVDM2-16), 2811 (PVDM2-16), 3725 (NM-HDV (2) > PVDM-12) > 2801 and a 1760 (2) PVDM-12 ,WIC-4ESW , NM-CUE and a bunch of dual and > single VWICs. I have a 3620 as a FRS with a NM-4T and a bunch of > wic-1Ts > left over from my R&S lab. > > What am I missing besides a VG248 and a 6500 w/ 6608? > > Any recomendation on which router should go where? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Michael <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gross > To: Mike O <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Michael Shavrov <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: 2008-09-10 9:49 PM > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > > That is really up to the lab you get. You might have PRI, you might > have > CAS. I only had 3 1760 routers I used for PRI/CAS work and then 3 more > 3725 > routers running in Dynamips/Dynagen for gatekeeper, etc. That's the > other > thing, 1760 does NOT do gatekeeper. I mostly did my labs with PRI, but > occasionally changed it up and configured them with CAS just in case, > and > for the experience. My PSTN router had a VWIC-2MFT-T1 and a > VWIC-2MFT-E1. > > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Mike O < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Well in the lab is all the PSTN connections to the PSTN router PRI's? or > is > one or two CAS? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Michael Gross <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Mike O <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Michael Shavrov <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: 2008-09-10 9:27 PM > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > > The 1760 router is only capable of using 2 ports for data. Cisco has a > document on the 1760 that explains this limitation. This includes a > voice > PRI as it considers this data since one channel is data. If you need > more > than 2 voice circuits you'll need to configure the others as T1 CAS. If > you > change "both" to "voice" it will allow the controller to create a CAS > T1/E1. > > I ran into this when I wanted to configure a 1760 as a PSTN router. I > had > to use a separate router as my frame-relay switch because of this > limitation. > > Mike Gross > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Mike O < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I don't have the network-clock commands and I'm running adventerprise > 12.4-15-T7 > > What IOS you running? > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Shavrov" < > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: < [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > Sent: 2008-09-10 9:00 PM > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > > > > > Why do you use "tdm clock" command? I have the only > "network-clock-participate slot 2" or "network-clock-participate wic 0", > and > everything works fine. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike O" < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "'OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam'" < [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 8:53 PM > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > > > > > I have a 1760 with (2) PVDM-12s and (2) VWIC-2MFT-T1/E1s and I get the > following when I try and configure all 4 ports > > First two are fine: > > tdm clock T1 0/0 both import onboard internal > tdm clock T1 0/1 both import onboard internal > > I try the second card and get this: > > Router(config)#tdm clock t1 1/0 both import onboard internal > % T1 data switch not available for this configuration > Router(config)# > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080910/4bd > 50b07/attachment-0001.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:24:00 -0500 > From: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > To: 'Mike O' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: OSL Group <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > My lab is configured so that the HQ gateway serves as the frame switch > to > Branch 1 and Branch 2 using crossover T-1 cables. > > -Jeff > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike O [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 10:02 PM > To: Michael Gross > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > > > In my lab I have: 3825(PVDM2-16), 2811 (PVDM2-16), 3725 (NM-HDV (2) > PVDM-12) > 2801 and a 1760 (2) PVDM-12 ,WIC-4ESW , NM-CUE and a bunch of dual and > single VWICs. I have a 3620 as a FRS with a NM-4T and a bunch of > wic-1Ts > left over from my R&S lab. > > What am I missing besides a VG248 and a 6500 w/ 6608? > > Any recomendation on which router should go where? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Michael <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gross > To: Mike O <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Michael Shavrov <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: 2008-09-10 9:49 PM > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > > That is really up to the lab you get. You might have PRI, you might > have > CAS. I only had 3 1760 routers I used for PRI/CAS work and then 3 more > 3725 > routers running in Dynamips/Dynagen for gatekeeper, etc. That's the > other > thing, 1760 does NOT do gatekeeper. I mostly did my labs with PRI, but > occasionally changed it up and configured them with CAS just in case, > and > for the experience. My PSTN router had a VWIC-2MFT-T1 and a > VWIC-2MFT-E1. > > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Mike O < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Well in the lab is all the PSTN connections to the PSTN router PRI's? or > is > one or two CAS? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Michael Gross <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Mike O <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Michael Shavrov <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: 2008-09-10 9:27 PM > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > > The 1760 router is only capable of using 2 ports for data. Cisco has a > document on the 1760 that explains this limitation. This includes a > voice > PRI as it considers this data since one channel is data. If you need > more > than 2 voice circuits you'll need to configure the others as T1 CAS. If > you > change "both" to "voice" it will allow the controller to create a CAS > T1/E1. > > I ran into this when I wanted to configure a 1760 as a PSTN router. I > had > to use a separate router as my frame-relay switch because of this > limitation. > > Mike Gross > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Mike O < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I don't have the network-clock commands and I'm running adventerprise > 12.4-15-T7 > > What IOS you running? > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Shavrov" < > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: < [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > Sent: 2008-09-10 9:00 PM > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > > > > > Why do you use "tdm clock" command? I have the only > "network-clock-participate slot 2" or "network-clock-participate wic 0", > and > everything works fine. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike O" < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "'OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam'" < [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 8:53 PM > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > > > > > I have a 1760 with (2) PVDM-12s and (2) VWIC-2MFT-T1/E1s and I get the > following when I try and configure all 4 ports > > First two are fine: > > tdm clock T1 0/0 both import onboard internal > tdm clock T1 0/1 both import onboard internal > > I try the second card and get this: > > Router(config)#tdm clock t1 1/0 both import onboard internal > % T1 data switch not available for this configuration > Router(config)# > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:26:55 -0500 > From: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity error question > To: OSL Group <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > In my lab, my Unity installation is completed and subscribers are > created. > CUCM has all the requisite config and verified its proper. > > When calls go to Unity, it rings 4 times then goes fast busy. I'm using > G.711 everywhere for now. > > Has anyone heard of this problem, before I go rebuild Unity? > > Tools depot call viewer shows the call coming in, then drops. > > Thanks, Jeff > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:22:32 +1000 > From: "Kumar, Narinder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for locally generated traffic > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > Michael, > You can set the dscp value on the voip dial-peers > Ip qos dscp ... > > > Cheers > Narinder > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2008 4:54 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 > > Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. QoS for locally generated traffic (Michael Shavrov) > 2. Re: Just Got My CCIE #21995 (Devildoc) > 3. Re: Access to IPC/Softphone in Proctor Labs (Mark Snow) > 4. Re: Just Got My CCIE #21995 (anil batra) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:08:01 -0400 > From: "Michael Shavrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for locally generated traffic > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi All, > > 1. We configure QoS for Frame Relay: > > class-map match-any Voice > match ip dscp ef > class-map match-any Signaling > match ip dscp af31 > ! > policy-map FR > class Voice > priority 256 > class Signaling > bandwidth 40 > class class-default > fair-queue > ! > map-class frame-relay FRTS > frame-relay cir 729600 > frame-relay bc 7296 > frame-relay be 0 > frame-relay mincir 729600 > frame-relay fragment 960 > service-policy output FR > ! > > interface Serial0/2/0 > frame-relay traffic-shaping > ! > interface Serial0/2/0.1 point-to-point > bandwidth 768 > frame-relay interface-dlci 102 > class FRTS > frame-relay ip rtp header-compression > > > 2. We configure re-marking for LAN traffic using NBAR > > class-map match-any NBAR > match protocol sip > match protocol h323 > match protocol skinny > match protocol mgcp > class-map match-any RTP > match protocol rtp > match ip rtp 16384 16383 > ! > policy-map LAN > class NBAR > set dscp cs3 > class RTP > set dscp ef > class class-default > set dscp default > ! > interface FastEthernet0/0 > service-policy output LAN > > It's good, it works, but what about the traffic, which is locally > generated? For example, signaling traffic from dial-peer (I know it's > possible to configure QoS on dial-peer) or voice stream from AA TCL > script? How do we re-mark this traffic if it goes over the WAN? Should > we nest "NBAR" class map through "map-class"? Which order? We will need > to classify and mark the traffic first with the proper DSCP value, and > then, based on this DSCP value, place the traffic into the proper queue > on the Serial interface. > > What you think? > > Sincerely, > > Mike > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080910/a34 > eb638/attachment-0001.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:32:33 -0700 > From: Devildoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Just Got My CCIE #21995 > To: Mark Snow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: CCIE Voice Online Study List <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > > Thanks Mark. And yes, i'll stick around. Passing the CCIE is not the > end of my journey. I can always learn more and contribute to what > little i know. :) > > JD > > > > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Just Got My CCIE > #21995Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 21:40:42 -0400JD -- CONGRATULATIONS. > > As Vik said - WELL Deserved!! > Hope you stick around! > > > > > > -- > Mark Snow > CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security) > > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Fax: +1.309.413.4097 > Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > Join our free online support and peer group communities: > http://www.IPexpert.com/communities > -- > IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, > Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco > CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice > Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. > -- > > On Sep 9, 2008, at 3:37 PM, Devildoc wrote: > > Hello All, Finally, I did it! I just passed my CCIE test yesterday. > I'd like to thank Vik, Mark and all members on this forum for your > support and commitment to answering all of the questions that I have > posted. Without your help and support, I may not even get to where I am > today, so many many thanks and much appreciation for your help and > support. JD > > See how Windows Mobile brings your life together?at home, work, or on > the go. See Now > _________________________________________________________________ > Get more out of the Web. Learn 10 hidden secrets of Windows Live. > http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cn > s!550F681DAD532637!5295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_domore_092008 > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080910/6c0 > 0dc2d/attachment-0001.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:58:49 -0400 > From: Mark Snow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Access to IPC/Softphone in Proctor > Labs > To: Antonio Cunanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected], James Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > We did remove it due to a compatibility issue. > > How often are your phones registering/deregistering? > Might you say around every 30 seconds? > > If that happens to be the case - on your BR2 router try doing the > following: > > telephony-service > keepalive 65535 > > > that may help a bit as the phones, once registered the first time, > won't try to check to make sure that the UCME is alive until ~45 days > have elapsed. > > -- > Mark Snow > CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security) > > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Fax: +1.309.413.4097 > Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > Join our free online support and peer group communities: > http://www.IPexpert.com/communities > -- > IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On- > Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S > Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and > CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. > -- > > On Sep 10, 2008, at 8:28 AM, Antonio Cunanan wrote: > > > Hi James, > > > > The last proctor lab session I had (Pod 1), I checked the Unity box > > and saw the folders there - "c:\program files\ip blue\vtgo\", but > > there were no files in the folder. > > > > Possibly the ip blue softphone has been removed or moved to another > > location? > > > > Anyone else experience the same issue? or am I looking at the wrong > > place? > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Antonio > > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:23 PM, James Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > [The entire original message is not included] > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:27:26 -0400 > From: "Michael Gross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > To: "Mike O" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > The 1760 router is only capable of using 2 ports for data. Cisco has a > document on the 1760 that explains this limitation. This includes a > voice > PRI as it considers this data since one channel is data. If you need > more > than 2 voice circuits you'll need to configure the others as T1 CAS. If > you > change "both" to "voice" it will allow the controller to create a CAS > T1/E1. > > I ran into this when I wanted to configure a 1760 as a PSTN router. I > had > to use a separate router as my frame-relay switch because of this > limitation. > > Mike Gross > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Mike O <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't have the network-clock commands and I'm running adventerprise > > 12.4-15-T7 > > > > What IOS you running? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Shavrov" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: 2008-09-10 9:00 PM > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > > > > > > Why do you use "tdm clock" command? I have the only > >> "network-clock-participate slot 2" or "network-clock-participate wic > 0", and > >> everything works fine. > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike O" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> To: "'OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam'" <[email protected]> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 8:53 PM > >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > >>> > >>> > >>> I have a 1760 with (2) PVDM-12s and (2) VWIC-2MFT-T1/E1s and I get > the > >>>> following when I try and configure all 4 ports > >>>> > >>>> First two are fine: > >>>> > >>>> tdm clock T1 0/0 both import onboard internal > >>>> tdm clock T1 0/1 both import onboard internal > >>>> > >>>> I try the second card and get this: > >>>> > >>>> Router(config)#tdm clock t1 1/0 both import onboard internal > >>>> % T1 data switch not available for this configuration > >>>> Router(config)# > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Any ideas? > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080910/218 > f797b/attachment-0001.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:49:51 -0400 > From: "Michael Gross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > To: "Mike O" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > That is really up to the lab you get. You might have PRI, you might > have > CAS. I only had 3 1760 routers I used for PRI/CAS work and then 3 more > 3725 > routers running in Dynamips/Dynagen for gatekeeper, etc. That's the > other > thing, 1760 does NOT do gatekeeper. I mostly did my labs with PRI, but > occasionally changed it up and configured them with CAS just in case, > and > for the experience. My PSTN router had a VWIC-2MFT-T1 and a > VWIC-2MFT-E1. > > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Mike O <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well in the lab is all the PSTN connections to the PSTN router PRI's? > or > > is one or two CAS? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* Michael Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > *To:* Mike O <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > *Cc:* Michael Shavrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; > > [email protected] > > *Sent:* 2008-09-10 9:27 PM > > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > > > > The 1760 router is only capable of using 2 ports for data. Cisco has > a > > document on the 1760 that explains this limitation. This includes a > voice > > PRI as it considers this data since one channel is data. If you need > more > > than 2 voice circuits you'll need to configure the others as T1 CAS. > If you > > change "both" to "voice" it will allow the controller to create a CAS > T1/E1. > > > > I ran into this when I wanted to configure a 1760 as a PSTN router. I > had > > to use a separate router as my frame-relay switch because of this > > limitation. > > > > Mike Gross > > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Mike O <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I don't have the network-clock commands and I'm running adventerprise > >> 12.4-15-T7 > >> > >> What IOS you running? > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Shavrov" < > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: <[email protected]> > >> Sent: 2008-09-10 9:00 PM > >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > >> > >> > >> Why do you use "tdm clock" command? I have the only > >>> "network-clock-participate slot 2" or "network-clock-participate wic > 0", and > >>> everything works fine. > >>> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike O" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> To: "'OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam'" <[email protected]> > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 8:53 PM > >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 1760-V as PSTN with 4 VWICs > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I have a 1760 with (2) PVDM-12s and (2) VWIC-2MFT-T1/E1s and I get > the > >>>>> following when I try and configure all 4 ports > >>>>> > >>>>> First two are fine: > >>>>> > >>>>> tdm clock T1 0/0 both import onboard internal > >>>>> tdm clock T1 0/1 both import onboard internal > >>>>> > >>>>> I try the second card and get this: > >>>>> > >>>>> Router(config)#tdm clock t1 1/0 both import onboard internal > >>>>> % T1 data switch not available for this configuration > >>>>> Router(config)# > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Any ideas? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080910/6e8 > d47c2/attachment.html > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CCIE_Voice mailing list > [email protected] > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > > > End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 31, Issue 66 > ****************************************** > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CCIE_Voice mailing list > [email protected] > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > > > End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 31, Issue 72 > ****************************************** > ________________________________ Want to do more with Windows Live? Learn "10 hidden secrets" from Jamie. Learn Now <http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!550F681DAD532637!5295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_domore_092008> T
