That's a good reminder and I thank you for understanding my NDA point. Also apologies if I offended Sean. There's always new people coming on here and a repeat of information isn't really to bad a thing.
I also hoped to give a large enough range to not make it an NDA issue. X to Y would have been better. Typing 1-100 points would have been useless. Just wanted to indicate that you should not skip any sections (that people said -ah, I'll just skip QoS, especially 6500) IPCC, etc. Hope the rest of the information was valuable to you and you exceed. The discouraging thing about failing is the frustration about "I could have done it technically", etc. Also the July 15th date change. Lots of people seem concerned, scared to death, they have purchased big dollar equipment for v2 , etc. Another piece of advice is don't consider this your only shot. Another mistake I made. I tried to hit a grand slam on the first pitch on my first at bat. It's said v3 is 75-80% the same concepts as v2 (VoIP, QoS, H323, GK, etc, etc, etc.) From: Bill Talley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 2:10 PM To: sean hurricane; Michael Ciarfello Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days Hi Sean, I don't have much advice to offer, other than don't be discouraged if you don't pass, as I've had my share of failed attempts. I also wanted to say I appreaciate you offering your personal email so list members didn't have to repeat advice to the list that may have previously been offered. I didn't interpret anything from your email as requesting nda info, however, some might consider a disclosure that IPCC might account for 10% of your score as an NDA violation. Not saying anyone that responded previously has violated NDA, but there are alot ways things can be interpretted via email so my other piece of advice would be to be careful on what you type. FWIW... ________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of sean hurricane [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 12:51 PM To: Michael Ciarfello Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days I don't believe i said anything about NDA, regarding IPCC, integration is not my problem and i can do most of the scripting, i am not just at a confident level where i can say scripting is a non-issue. if the script are as lengthy and difficult as ipexpert lab then i may struggle and just roll the dice on that portion of the lab. if not with lady luck on my side i should triumph. On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Michael Ciarfello <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I have no nda stuff to share (either should anyone else) so no need for private e-mail. Taken from my experience: If it's your first time you will meet the following: Unfamiliar with environment. Unfamiliar with the PC, can't beat the nervousness, the anxiety, the frustrations you will encounter, the anxiousness-no matter how you say to yourself that you are ok. Remember you only have a 20 point margin. If you get IPCC questions and they are worth 5-10-whatever points, your margin dropped by a LOT. You will encounter small problems on the test that didn't happen during your studies. These take time to fix (because you are an expert and know how to fix them) but eat up your time. A lot of people say most people don't finish due to running out of time. I knew how to do EVERY question. I didn't have time to properly test everything-taking a lot of questions on faith that they worked. I also couldn't get things to work that I knew how to do from customer experience and practiced in the lab many times and when I got home and tried it, it also worked. Could have also been just mental blocks. I'd say at the 5 hour mark, you better have a running tally of how many points you think you have. If not over 80, you better work on the low hanging fruit to try to get those points back. At the 6 hour mark, your configurations are supposed to be complete and you test for 2 hours. If your tally is not above 80, then you get into my situation of taking some things on faith, testing others and resolving issues on others. You should know whether you passed or failed during the test. If you think you got everything correct and you end up failing (which I've heard from people,) then you were kidding yourself somewhere. You should know in your configurations and your testing whether it worked or not. There are always the points for "what the proctor was looking for", but I don't think there are 20 points worth of those. I wish you luck, but your statement "but for the most part i have most of the topic down cold" you will wish you never wrote. It will haunt you. And I do believe some of the test is luck and things falling into place vs giving trouble just to give trouble. Karma is huge. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of sean hurricane Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 12:29 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days my e-mail address is [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> if anyone wants to contact me privately. On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:25 PM, sean hurricane <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: My lab is in five days, any advice? especially from those who have passed. i have some issues especially with IPCC but for the most part i have most of the topic down cold. I will appreciate any advice even from those who failed, at least i wont have to repeat their mistake. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission (including any accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its authorized recipient(s), and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible for delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended recipient, be aware that any review, copying, printing, distribution, use or disclosure of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please delete it from your system without copying it, and contact sender immediately by Reply e-mail, or by calling 913-307-2300, so that our address records can be corrected. Although this e-mail and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might negatively affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the sender for any loss or damage arising in any way in the event that such a virus or defect exists.
