Table 6 is also bad.
Thanks, all, for the feedback. That's what I thought. Been a long week already. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't dreaming. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Ciarfello Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:19 PM To: Jason Granat Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-CUE and 2801 Feels good to help. Yea, Table 7 is inaccurate. oops. _____ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Granat [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 8:59 PM To: Jason Granat Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-CUE and 2801 Hope that didn't sound too short. I was just excited to post an answer to a question here that I finally knew the answer to :-) Sent while mobile On Aug 6, 2009, at 17:53, Jason Granat <[email protected]> wrote: If you scroll down to table 10 it shows that the only CUE module supported on the 2801 is the AIM-CUE. Sent while mobile On Aug 6, 2009, at 17:26, Brian Valentine <[email protected]> wrote: Am I missing something? The CUE Compatibility matrix says that the NM-CUE is supported on 2801. Since the 2801 doesn't have network modules, should I assume this is a mistake? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity_exp/compatibility/cuecom p.htm Brian _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com _____ http://slash128.com _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com _____ http://slash128.com
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
