Hi Otto, I think i should apologize to the rest of fellow's and of course you too. This is a very big mistake that i've made and let me unforgettable. You're right, the CUCMBE is a single server solution which cannot add any subscriber to the cluster, referring to CUCM SRND page 1017,
"Because Unified CMBE runs on a single hardware platform, it provides a single instance of Unified CM (a combined publisher and single subscriber instance, and a secondary subscriber instance is not configurable)." Well, i think re-understand the SRND is what i need to do now before proceeding with the new setup and installation. Thanks for all the support. Shingei On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Otto Sanchez <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Shingei, > > That's why I asked those command outputs, I wanted to confirm that this was > valid publisher node, because the message that you are getting relates to > the sub not finding the publisher figure on the "pub" node, that should be > the problem, you are basically installing two different products, so the sub > installation will not recognize the cucmbe as a valid cucm "pub" node > > Remember that cucmbe is a single server solution and you cannot add any new > subscriber to the cluster, it's like an standalone cluster by itself and > hardened to work with the intended server infrastructure, > > HTH, > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:34 PM, ShinGei Yong <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Otto, >> >> I believe the installation process were followed carefully according to >> the installation guide. The only difference is the the guide below show the >> CUCM installation, and my current first node is CUCMBE(which mean CUCM and >> CUC coexist). During the 2nd node(Sub) installation, i choose CUCM. >> >> Does it cause any issue? >> >> I'll capture below request file and send to you shortly. >> >> thanks >> Shingei. >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Otto Sanchez <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Did you make sure you carefully followed these guidelines?: >>> >>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/install/7_0_1/install/cmins701.html#wp350770 >>> >>> If yes, please provide install and upgrade log by the time the sub >>> installation was performed and the output of the following commands: >>> >>> run sql select name,nodeid from ProcessNode >>> show network cluster >>> show network eth0 >>> >>> Also, system and application log, >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:40 AM, ShinGei Yong <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Opps, the message bounce back due to the file size restriction. >>>> >>>> Gang, you may request the capture log file from me if you willing to >>>> help. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> Shingei. >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: ShinGei Yong <[email protected]> >>>> Date: Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:02 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Failure of Adding subscriber-VM Server >>>> 2.0 >>>> To: Duy Nguyen <[email protected]>, [email protected], >>>> [email protected], [email protected] >>>> Cc: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Bill, >>>> >>>> Regarding the VMWare setup, for VM Server 2.0, there are only two >>>> network mode available which are to "host" only and "bridge". For the ease >>>> of setup, i configured the network option for both nodes connected to host, >>>> so i can monitor the setup easily, other words, my machine is the "gateway" >>>> for both nodes. Both of them able to reach me through icmp ping and each >>>> other vice versa, no any "firewall" in between. Also, there is only a >>>> single >>>> 10.10.210.5 Pub server in VM network. Both nodes are assigned to the same >>>> VMnet interface. You may refer to the attached pic named "CUCM-PUB-SUB & >>>> RTMT Server connectivity" >>>> >>>> Hi Duy, >>>> >>>> IP was used throughout the entire setup, else the CUCM-PUB (10.10.210.5) >>>> ip address will not appear on the validation error screen. Also, from the >>>> jpg named CUCM-PUB-SUB, it shown that the IP address is assigned to PUB and >>>> SUB. >>>> >>>> Hi Pavan, >>>> >>>> Please find attached log files. As the VM node not connecting to a >>>> physical switch, i'm not sure can sniff the VMnet adapter interface. The >>>> environment doesn't contain a DNS server, i tried to reduce the complexity >>>> by not using DNS in IP network. >>>> >>>> Guys, i attached another 2 jpg which showing that i initiated the system >>>> validation from CUCM-Sub console while RTMT is ON and monitoring the >>>> process. Please take note on the timestamp on the WINXP machine, showing >>>> 20:55:46 which i started the validation. The 2nd jpg named log message 2 >>>> showing that the validation has failed, and the RTMT system log showing >>>> that the process ended at 20:55:50. During this period of time, the process >>>> named >>>> >>>> Mar 4 20:55:46, CUCM-PUB, Info, sshd(pam_unix)[18244], : session opened >>>> for user sftpuser by (uid=0), 18778 >>>> Mar 4 20:55:46, CUCM-PUB, Info, sshd(pam_unix)[18244], : session closed >>>> for user sftpuser, 18779...etc" and keep repeated >>>> >>>> The last two attachment are the System Log and Security Log copy out >>>> from RTMT. When refer to the security log at timing 20:55:46, the process >>>> show >>>> "Mar 4 20:55:46, CUCM-PUB, Info, sshd[18244], : Accepted password for >>>> sftpuser from :ffff:10.10.210.11 port 32829 ssh2, 13371 >>>> Mar 4 20:55:46, CUCM-PUB, Info, sshd[18246], : subsystem request for >>>> sftp, 13372" >>>> >>>> >>>> All help are welcome, guys. >>>> >>>> Many thanks >>>> Shingei >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Duy Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Make it simplistic and add by ip. >>>>> >>>>> Pavan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >Do you have a dns server that is reachable from sub? >>>>> >Can you sniff the packets and post a capture? >>>>> > >>>>> >Sent from my phone >>>>> > >>>>> >On Mar 3, 2010, at 10:24 AM, ShinGei Yong <[email protected]> >>>>> >wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> Hi Bill, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Thanks for spotting out the difference between the naming of the >>>>> >> nodes. Has been re-verify again the the node's naming and the >>>>> >> confirmed the hostname is correct throughout the setup. The naming >>>>> >> for Sub is under_scroll instead of hypen on the VM Console was just >>>>> >> because its a naming of the VM console. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Applying a upgrade patch on CUCM under VM platform don't think is >>>>> >> possible. In fact, i didn't apply ANY patches to the CUCM-PUB, so am >>>>> >> sure the both the CUCM-PUB and CUCM-SUB version are same. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Anymore possible solution coming? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Thanks >>>>> >> Shingei >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Bill Talley <[email protected]> >>>>> >> wrote: >>>>> >> Are you sure hostnames are correct? On the previous screenshot >>>>> >> your CUCM-PUB servername has a hyphen between CUCM-PUB, however, you >>>>> >> vmware console window for your sub has CUCM_SUB. Is by chance your >>>>> >> PUB hostname CUCM_PUB, with an underscore instead of a hyphen? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Any chance you had applied a patch to the PUB previously and it's no >>>>> >> longer version 7.0.1.11000-2? I've never tried installing a sub >>>>> >> with a different version so I'm not sure what the error would be >>>>> >> that is generated in that scenario. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Mar 2, 2010, at 12:59 AM, ShinGei Yong wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> Hi Roger, Berry, >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Am already did that a few times, adding, removing and re-adding the >>>>> >>> CUCM-Sub into the cluster inventory, but still got no chance to get >>>>> >>> it work. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> I think i've out of my mind, can't think of any possibilities. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Anyone else can help? >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Thanks >>>>> >>> Shingei >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Berry, Matthew J. < >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>> > wrote: >>>>> >>> Good point, Roger. CUCM Pub needs something to validate against. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> - Sent from my Blackberry >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> From: [email protected] < >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> To: ShinGei Yong <[email protected]>; >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>> <[email protected]> >>>>> >>> Sent: Mon Mar 01 04:27:15 2010 >>>>> >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Failure of Adding subscriber-VM >>>>> >>> Server 2.0 >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Hi Shingei, >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> This maybe a long shot, but anyway, have you added the sub as a UCM >>>>> >>> server on the pub before you tried to add it as a 2nd node? >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Roger Källberg >>>>> >>> Unified Communication Consultant >>>>> >>> Cygate AB >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> From: ShinGei Yong [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>> >>> Sent: den 1 mars 2010 03:29 >>>>> >>> To: [email protected] >>>>> >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Failure of Adding subscriber-VM Server >>>>> >>> 2.0 >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Hi All, >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Im currently having the issue of adding the 2nd node to the UCM >>>>> >>> cluster. The error message as per attached jpg "Configuration >>>>> >>> Validation with CUCM-PUB Failed". >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> I've did some research based on the error message, either from >>>>> >>> CISCO or some older post. What i've tried out was: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> 1. Adding a NTP server to CUCM-PUB. CUCM-PUB was able to get the >>>>> >>> time source from my WINXP modified NTP server, and can be viewed >>>>> >>> from CUCM CLI. >>>>> >>> 2. Changed of Security Password. Based on CISCO explanation, it >>>>> >>> could be due to the security password mismatch between CUCM-PUB and >>>>> >>> SUB. I've reset the security password and reboot the CUCM-PUB, but >>>>> >>> still got no luck. I did tried to input an "incorrect" Security >>>>> >>> Password while adding the 2nd node, it did correctly prompt that >>>>> >>> the password was error. So confirmed that the security password >>>>> >>> entered was correct. >>>>> >>> 3. Some post mentioned that the MTU for the CUCM, will have some >>>>> >>> issue if leave it to default, but i'm not too sure what does it >>>>> >>> mean? Should i change it to MTU size to 1492? >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> I'm currently using VMWare Server 2.0. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> regards, >>>>> >>> Shingei >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>>> >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >> >>>>> >> ____________________________ >>>>> >> Bill Talley >>>>> >> IP Telephony Consultant >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Alexander Open Systems, Inc >>>>> >> 12851 Foster, Suite 200 >>>>> >> Overland Park, KS 66213 >>>>> >> (913) 307-2330, Scheduling Group >>>>> >> (913) 307-2380, Fax >>>>> >> [email protected] >>>>> >> http://www.aos5.com >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission (including >>>>> >> any accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its authorized >>>>> >> recipient(s), and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged >>>>> >> information. If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible >>>>> >> for delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended >>>>> >> recipient, be aware that any review, copying, printing, >>>>> >> distribution, use or disclosure of the contents of this message is >>>>> >> strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail >>>>> >> message in error, please delete it from your system without copying >>>>> >> it, and contact sender immediately by Reply e-mail, or by calling >>>>> 913-307-2300 >>>>> >> , so that our address records can be corrected. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Although this e-mail and any attachments are believed to be free of >>>>> >> any virus or other defect that might negatively affect any computer >>>>> >> system into which it is received and opened, it is the >>>>> >> responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and >>>>> >> no responsibility is accepted by the sender for any loss or damage >>>>> >> arising in any way in the event that such a virus or defect exists. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>>> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>>> >> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >_______________________________________________ >>>>> >For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> Otto Sanchez >>> CCIE #25592 (Voice) >>> Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. >>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com >>> >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > > Otto Sanchez > CCIE #25592 (Voice) > Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
