I totally agree and I'm glad you are seeing it that way. Let us know you're outcome.
On Apr 8, 2010, at 1:30 PM, sean hurricane wrote: > Mark, > > this is just to proof a point, but in a bind it's something to have in > your back pocket. > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Mark Holloway <m...@markholloway.com> wrote: > The reason I point out the other procedure (using the loopback interface) is > that changing UCM's H.323 settings to allow traffic from any IP is not > considered 'best practice' and could be marked as incorrect. > > On Apr 8, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Cristobal Priego wrote: > >> tehre is asetting also as Pavan said >> go to service parameters >ccm and look for the H.323 device, unknown tcp >> connections is set to false by default, set it to true and let us know how >> it goes >> >> 2010/4/8 sean hurricane <shurric...@gmail.com> >> Thanks all, i will try these suggestions tonite and provide feedback. >> >> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Mark Holloway <m...@markholloway.com> wrote: >> Are you using the Loopback 0 ip address as the Device Name for the H323 >> gateway in UCM? Do you have 'h323-gateway voip interface' and 'h323-gateway >> voip bind srcaddr x.x.x.x' on the router's Loopback 0 interface so packets >> are sources from Loopback 0? >> >> >> >> On Apr 7, 2010, at 8:46 PM, sean hurricane wrote: >> >>> Still no luck, spent hours on this tonite >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:24 PM, sean hurricane <shurric...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> i will try that tonite. >>> >>> Thanks all >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Ashar Siddiqui <siddas...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> You could very well be another victim of db_replication. >>> Take off your sub from the CCM group and make everything register with PUB. >>> Give it a go and see if it works... >>> >>> Ash> >>> >>> >>> On 07/04/2010 17:50, sean hurricane wrote: >>>> 10.10.201.1 is the configured ip address in UCCM. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:12 PM, James Rosenfelt <jaros...@cisco.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> 04/06/2010 23:57:43.327 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the >>>> >>>> TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, >>>> >>>> can't >>>> >>>> find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. >>>> >>>> |<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.10.210.11><CT::0,0,0,0.0><IP::><DEV::><LVL::Error><MASK::0100> >>>> >>>> Is 10.10.201.1 the configured IP address in CUCM for the H323 GW? >>>> >>>> That’s why it’s failing. If CUCM doesn’t have the IP configured as a H323 >>>> gw that matches the source then it will reject the call. >>>> >>>> I’ve had a similar problem when I was sourcing H323 from the incorrect >>>> interface. >>>> >>>> James Rosenfelt >>>> Network Consulting Engineer >>>> Advanced Services >>>> >>>> jaros...@cisco.com >>>> Phone :425-468-0912 >>>> Mobile :425-241-0702 >>>> Epage :jaros...@epage.cisco.com >>>> >>>> This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole >>>> use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure >>>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient >>>> (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by >>>> reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks, >>> Ashar Siddiqui >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> > >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
