Hi Semyon,
 
1. Longest digit match will be selected first.
2. Explicitly defined numbers are stripped off - so example if you dial
9001XXXXXX 9011 dialpeer will match but will send 1XXXXXX only. if you want
to send 001 you have to do prefix 00
3. while dialing do "debug voip dialpeer" will tell you which is matched and
selected for routing.
4. you may use preference command lower the preference number higher the
priority to match.
 
Hope this helps.
 
-Shrini
 

  _____  

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Semyon Taskin
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Dial-peer matching in CME


Hi Guys,

stuck with CME routing.

I have 2 dial-peers:
929    pots  up   up             9[0-9].......      0
up   0/2/0:15
9011   pots  up   up   00        900T               0
up   0/2/0:15

when I try to dial 9001456222111 it matches dial-peer 929 right after I dial
9th digit. 
So obviously it matches dial-peer 929.

In this case should it match dial-peer 9011 as it is more specific match?
How do I make it match dial-peer 9011 without changing pattern in dial-peer
929?

Thank you. 




On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:43 PM, <[email protected]>
wrote:


Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
       [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
       http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
       [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
       [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Barge is not working in SRST - RESOLVED (Mritunjay Kumar)
  2. why trunk mode on ESW? (=?gbk?B?YnJ1bm8=?=)
  3. Re: Presence btw CUCM and CME (Roger K?llberg)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:45:10 +0530
From: Mritunjay Kumar <[email protected]>
To: Shrini <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Barge is not working in SRST -
       RESOLVED
Message-ID:
       <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Shrini,

Thanks for your time on this issue.
but i am still wondering , how my config is different than yours.
I disabled privacy under telephony service as well as under both ephones
but still did not work for me.

Please clarify further.
appreciate your help !

Regards,
Mritunjay

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Shrini <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi Mrintunjay,
>
> Here is the working config. Took an hour to figure it out :-)
> There is a bug associated with CME 12.4T *CSCti11843*
>
> telephony-service
>  sdspfarm units 2
>  sdspfarm tag 1 BR1-CNF
>  no privacy
>  conference hardware
>  srst mode auto-provision none
>  srst ephone template 1
>  srst dn line-mode dual-octo
>  max-ephones 2
>  max-dn 10
>  ip source-address 14.160.116.40 port 2000
>  system message Your current option
>  time-zone 5
>  time-format 24
>  max-conferences 12 gain -6
>  transfer-system full-consult
>  create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Jan 18 2011 07:20:56
> !
> !
> ephone-template  1
> softkeys remote-in-use CBarge Newcall
> !
> ephone-dn  1  dual-line
>  number 3001 no-reg primary
>  preference 5
> !
> ephone-dn  2  dual-line
>  number 3002 no-reg primary
>  preference 6
> !
> ephone-dn  3  octo-line
>  number A000
>  conference ad-hoc
>  preference 1
> !
> ephone  1
>  privacy off
> !
> ephone  2
>  privacy off
>
>
> On 1/18/2011 2:19 AM, Mritunjay Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi Shrini,
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/archives/ccie_voice/2010-November/071295.html
>
> "privacy off"  under ephone-template  does not work as this is a bug.
> it is tested and discussed  at
> http://onlinestudylist.com/archives/ccie_voice/2010-November/071295.html
>
> but  i tried with ephone template but did not work either :(
>
> attaching sh runn .
>
> Regards,
> Mritunjay
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Miron Kobelski
<[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I suggest to follow Randall's suggestion, as this has already been
>> discussed many times...
>>
>> regards
>> kobel
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:35, Mritunjay Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> thanks for reply and sorry for delayed response.
>>>
>>> set the max-ephone to 2 and phone type is set  but still not working :(
>>>
>>> 1111 is octo number shared by two phone which is used for Cbarge
>>> 2222  is adhoc conference number.
>>>
>>> Is there any bug or workaround. same config was working earlier!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mritunjay
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Randall Saborio
<[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> This problem has come up quite a few times on this mailing list.
>>>> You can go to the archives and do a search and you should find the
>>>> solution:
>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/archives/ccie_voice/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Mritunjay Kumar
<[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Hi All ,
>>>>>
>>>>> Cbarge in SRST is not working
>>>>>
>>>>> here is the config
>>>>>
>>>>> telephony-service
>>>>>  sdspfarm units 2
>>>>>  sdspfarm tag 1 BR1-CNF
>>>>>  no privacy
>>>>>  conference hardware
>>>>>  srst mode auto-provision none
>>>>>  srst dn line-mode dual
>>>>>  max-ephones 20
>>>>>  max-dn 20
>>>>>  ip source-address 14.160.116.40 port 2000
>>>>>  max-conferences 12 gain -6
>>>>>  transfer-system full-consult
>>>>>  create cnf-files version-stamp Jan 01 2002 00:00:00
>>>>> BR1#
>>>>>
>>>>> ephone-template  1
>>>>>  softkeys remote-in-use  CBarge
>>>>> ephone-dn  1  octo-line
>>>>>  number 1111 no-reg primary
>>>>> ephone-dn  2  octo-line
>>>>>  number 2222
>>>>>  conference ad-hoc
>>>>> ephone-dn  3  dual-line
>>>>>  number 3001 no-reg primary
>>>>>  preference 5
>>>>> ephone-dn  4  dual-line
>>>>>  number 3002 no-reg primary
>>>>>  preference 5
>>>>>
>>>>> ephone  1
>>>>>  privacy off
>>>>>  device-security-mode none
>>>>>  mac-address 0026.CBBE.E8C9
>>>>>  ephone-template 1
>>>>>  button  1:3 2:1
>>>>>
>>>>> ephone  2
>>>>>  privacy off
>>>>>  device-security-mode none
>>>>>  mac-address 0026.CBBE.EC4F
>>>>>  ephone-template 1
>>>>>  button  1:4 2:1
>>>>>
>>>>> hardware conf is registered .
>>>>>
>>>>> privacy is disabled under telephony service and in ephone. CME version
>>>>> 7.1
>>>>>
>>>>> any missing config here ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Please suggest.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Mritunjay
>>>>>
>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Randall "da ill" Saborio
>>>> CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
</archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110119/0d04fd8f/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:18:53 +0800
From: "=?gbk?B?YnJ1bm8=?=" <[email protected]>
To: "=?gbk?B?Y2NpZV92b2ljZQ==?=" <[email protected]>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] why trunk mode on ESW?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk"

Dear all
 in vol1 network infrastrure,
 why we need to configure trunk mode on esw,why not access mode .i have test
the access mode is ok.

SITEB(config)#int range f0/1/0 -3

SITEB(config-if-range)# switchport trunk native vlan 602

SITEB(config-if-range)# switchport mode trunk

SITEB(config-if-range)# switchport voice vlan 502

SITEB(config-if-range)#description ***CONNECT TO IP PHONE***



SITEC#show interfaces f0/1/0 switchport

Name: Fa0/1/0

Switchport: Enabled

Administrative Mode: trunk

Operational Mode: trunk

Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q

Operational Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q

Negotiation of Trunking: Disabled

Access Mode VLAN: 0 ((Inactive))

Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 602 (DATA-VLAN)

Trunking VLANs Enabled: ALL

Trunking VLANs Active: 1,502,602

Protected: false

Priority for untagged frames: 0

Override vlan tag priority: FALSE

Voice VLAN: 502

Appliance trust: none



Best Regards,

bruno
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
</archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110119/b1c8cf97/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:48:51 +0100
From: Roger K?llberg <[email protected]>
To: Mritunjay Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence btw CUCM and CME
Message-ID:
       <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Then it won't work.

Roger K?llberg
CCIE #26199 (Voice)
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons v?g 21, SE-217 62 MALM?

________________________________
Fr?n: Mritunjay Kumar [[email protected]]
Skickat: den 18 januari 2011 11:02
Till: Roger K?llberg
Kopia: Miron Kobelski; [email protected]
?mne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence btw CUCM and CME

Hi Roger ,

both cucm and cme phone are sccp phones.

Regards,
Mritunjay

2011/1/18 Roger K?llberg
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
The problem that was stated out in the to the previous tread linked to by
kobel is for SCCP phones on CME. According to that you will only be able to
get precense on SIP phones in CME

Snipplet taken from that tread, "I had written notes that Vik said  CUCM
SCCP Phone can't monitor CME phones in 7.0, but SIP should work fine."

What kind of phones do you have on CME, SIP or SCCP?

Roger K?llberg
CCIE #26199 (Voice)
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons v?g 21, SE-217 62 MALM?
________________________________
Fr?n: Mritunjay Kumar [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Skickat: den 18 januari 2011 10:25
Till: Roger K?llberg; Miron Kobelski
Kopia: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
?mne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence btw CUCM and CME

Hi Miron


thanks for sharing this.

i can conclude from this link that presence does not for following

phone1-CUCM------SIP -----CME-phone2

if phone1 is sccp then it cannot  see the status of phone2.
is this correct ? does any doc tell this ?

hi Roger ,

I put the RP in partition which is accessible by phone's subscribe CSS but
did not help :(

Regards,
Mritunjay

2011/1/18 Roger K?llberg
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Do you have subscribe CSS assigned to both SIP trunk and phone devices? Also
try to add the RP to a partition that is seen in the subscribe CSS, should't
make any difference, but I personaly prefer not to use the none PT. Reason
is that you have less control of what a specific CSS should be able to
"see", but that's just my preference.

Sincerely

Roger K?llberg
CCIE #26199 (Voice)
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons v?g 21, SE-217 62 MALM?

________________________________
Fr?n: Mritunjay Kumar [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Skickat: den 18 januari 2011 09:35
Till: Roger K?llberg
Kopia: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
?mne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence btw CUCM and CME

Hi All,

thank for reply.
here is the answer

allow watch is configured under ephone-dn
set the CUP Publish trunk to respective trunk but did not help. i guess this
is only for CUPS

subscribe CSS is set to access the phone dn.

Regards,
Mritunjay

2011/1/18 Roger K?llberg
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Hi Mritunjay,
In your config snipplet I don't see any allow watch on your ephone-dn's.

See this url,
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/command/reference/cme_a1
ht.html#wp1016553<https://webmail.cygate.se/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/c
ommand/reference/,DanaInfo=.awxyCgnyjwImzy+cme_a1ht.html#wp1016553>


Sincerely

Roger K?llberg
CCIE #26199 (Voice)
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons v?g 21, SE-217 62 MALM?

________________________________
Fr?n: Mritunjay Kumar [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Skickat: den 18 januari 2011 06:16
Till: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
?mne: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence btw CUCM and CME

Hi All,

CME phone is able to watch the status of CUCM phone but reverse is not
working.

config
on CME

presence
 presence call-list
 server 14.160.108.20  // .20 is sub
 max-subscription 120
 watcher all
 allow subscribe
 presence enable

sip-ua

 presence enable

ephone  2
 device-security-mode none
 mac-address 0022.9059.843D
 ephone-template 1
 presence call-list
 blf-speed-dial 2 2001 label "2001

dial-peer voice 321 voip
 destination-pattern 2001
 session protocol sipv2
 session target ipv4:14.160.108.20
 incoming called-number .


on cucm

phone1 (2001) has blf-speed dial  to 4000 (CME phone)

Route pattern 4XXX  (Null partition )to SIP trunk (Towards CME)

On SIP trunk ,

security profile is applied , valid check box ie accept presence sub  and
accept unsolicited  are enabled.

DN  and trunk are in same presence group.  Subscribe CSS can access DN 2001.

when 2001 goes off hook , status can be seen on CME phone
but other way , its not working.

CUCM phone can make a call to CME phone by pressing BLF Speed dial

Any missing config here ?

Regards,
Mritunjay





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110118/16ae4472/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CCIE_Voice mailing list
[email protected]
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice


End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 59, Issue 154
*******************************************





-- 
Regards,
Semyon

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to