I would say it all depends on the dial plan. Both can pretty much accomplish the same; the problem at least for me is, how complex it gets when TEHO, backup GWs and calling/called party presentation comes into play. In my opinion CdPT patterns are scalable and they help you reduce your dial plan however the CCIE does not care about scalability, just functionality. Get used to both approaches; old school and the one introduced in CUCM 7; then you should be able to come with an action plan when your sitting in the lab.
Regards, Roger Carpio. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:31 PM, adam compton <com...@gmail.com> wrote: > The list is probably tired of hearing from me tonight :) > > So when should you choose Called party transformation mask over route > pattern/route list manipulation. > > I ran into a question with Device mobility that required called party > transformation, but I can't identify any other scenarios where i would > absolutely want to use called party transformation. > > Does it make plus dialing manipulation easier? > > Regards, > Adam Compton > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
