you will be able to open pdf files 2011/6/22 Chris Green <voice5...@yahoo.com>
> Actually, this is ended with PDF file, can we open PDF file during exam > time. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com" < > ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com> > > *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > *Sent:* Wed, 22 June, 2011 11:37:28 > *Subject:* CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 64, Issue 177 > > Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to > ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: route group distribution algorithm (Randall Saborio) > 2. UCM LOCATION QUESTION (Stephen Manuel) > 3. Re: route group distribution algorithm > (givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com) > 4. Re: UCM LOCATION QUESTION (Cristobal Priego) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:06:48 -0600 > From: Randall Saborio <ill2...@gmail.com> > To: Cristobal Priego <cristobalpri...@gmail.com> > Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm > Message-ID: <BANLkTin5zSzWXV08XPM=+x5je2tspgf...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Or maybe because it is never used or it never matters. If it would matter, > then they would be specific about it. > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Cristobal Priego < > cristobalpri...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > the reason why i am asking is because in the lab they're not that > specific > > > > > > 2011/6/22 CCIE STUDENT <cciefo...@hotmail.com> > > > >> You rarely even do it in the real world > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Randall Saborio <ill2...@gmail.com> > >> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:26:24 > >> To: <cristobalpri...@gmail.com> > >> Cc: <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> > >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm > >> > >> Can you name when on the lab would you ever configure two devices on > same > >> route group? > >> > >> I don't think this is ever done on the lab. Even if it did, its not a > >> matter of preference, but a matter of matching the task requirements. > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Cristobal Priego < > >> cristobalpri...@gmail.com <mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> guys, > >> > >> for the lab, whenever you configure your route groups > >> > >> which distribution algorithm is better > >> > >> circular or top down > >> > >> i use top down all the time, but i'd like to know your opinion on this > > >> > >> thanks > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please > >> visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com> > > >> > >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Randall "da ill" Saborio > >> CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811 > >> > > > > > > > -- > Randall "da ill" Saborio > CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811 > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110622/650f2f6f/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:18:18 -0400 > From: "Stephen Manuel" <srman...@bellsouth.net> > > To: <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION > Message-ID: <007201cc3100$615f7a70$241e6f50$@bellsouth.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Experts, > > > > I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering > in my mind. > > > > The example is this: > > > > In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM > architecture, each site has it's own device pool, region, and location > settings. > > > > All the DN's on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls > between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the > SIP Trunk/PSTN. > > > > Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones. > > > > Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. > > > > Calls between regions use g729 > > Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711 > > > > The location setting for site A is unlimited. > > The location setting for site B is 256 > > > > What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP > Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in > it's own Device Pool, region, etc. > > > > Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited > so no issue there. > > According to the Cisco Research I've done, a call requires 2 streams. > > Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk > calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound which requires 24k which causes > Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed ?? > > > > IMO, the call will fail. > > > > Thanks, > > Stephen Manuel > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110622/8cd880d0/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:26:12 -0700 > From: <givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com> > To: "'Cristobal Priego'" <cristobalpri...@gmail.com>, "'CCIE STUDENT'" > <cciefo...@hotmail.com> > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm > Message-ID: <000001cc3101$7ce480a0$76ad81e0$@com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > If they aren't specific in the lab, then it's not a requirement of the > solution. I don't believe I've ever seen or heard of this in the lab, more > of a written exam question, if anything. > > > > Jeff > > > > > From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com > [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cristobal > Priego > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 8:59 AM > To: CCIE STUDENT > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm > > > > the reason why i am asking is because in the lab they're not that specific > > 2011/6/22 CCIE STUDENT <cciefo...@hotmail.com> > > You rarely even do it in the real world > > -----Original Message----- > From: Randall Saborio <ill2...@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:26:24 > To: <cristobalpri...@gmail.com> > Cc: <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm > > Can you name when on the lab would you ever configure two devices on same > route group? > > I don't think this is ever done on the lab. Even if it did, its not a > matter > of preference, but a matter of matching the task requirements. > > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Cristobal Priego < > cristobalpri...@gmail.com > <mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com> > wrote: > guys, > > for the lab, whenever you configure your route groups > > which distribution algorithm is better > > circular or top down > > i use top down all the time, but i'd like to know your opinion on this > > > thanks > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com> > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com> > > > > > > -- > Randall "da ill" Saborio > CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811 > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110622/1d8c383c/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:37:26 -0700 > From: Cristobal Priego <cristobalpri...@gmail.com> > To: Stephen Manuel <srman...@bellsouth.net> > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION > Message-ID: <banlktimw3pmzdd3bxtxgdec+pnuhq7q...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > Stephen, > > the call will fail > you're going to get a message on the phone saying "not enough bandwidth" > and > the call will drop > > 2011/6/22 Stephen Manuel <srman...@bellsouth.net> > > > Experts, **** > > > > ** ** > > > > I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is > lingering > > in my mind. **** > > > > ** ** > > > > The example is this:**** > > > > ** ** > > > > In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM > > architecture, each site has it?s own device pool, region, and location > > settings. **** > > > > ** ** > > > > All the DN?s on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning > calls > > between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not > the > > SIP Trunk/PSTN. **** > > > > ** ** > > > > Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones.**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. **** > > > > ** ** > > > > Calls between regions use g729**** > > > > Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711**** > > > > ** ** > > > > The location setting for site A is unlimited.**** > > > > The location setting for site B is 256**** > > > > ** ** > > > > What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP > > Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also > in > > it?s own Device Pool, region, etc?**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is > unlimited > > so no issue there. **** > > > > According to the Cisco Research I?ve done, a call requires 2 streams. > **** > > > > Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk > > calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound which requires 24k which causes > > Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed > ??** > > ** > > > > ** ** > > > > IMO, the call will fail.**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Thanks, **** > > > > Stephen Manuel**** > > > > ** ** > > > > ** ** > > > > ** ** > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110622/8e3c3765/attachment.html> > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CCIE_Voice mailing list > CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > > > End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 64, Issue 177 > ******************************************* > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com