"1.) I thought IOS would refuse attaching a class to a dlci without frts on the physical interface."
In my experience, it is possible to enable FRTS on a PVC, but you may receive a warning message. If I remember correctly, the message simply states that FRTS commands are required on the physical interface. I wouldn't be surprised if the behavior differs between versions of IOS and MQC vs. legacy FTS, though. Thanks, Michael On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:14 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > I ran into a problem the other day that has me confused. > I ran auto qos on the hq side, changed values as needed and pasted the > modified policy in the hq router. > I then took the same policy and pasted it into the SB router config and > bound it to the dlci. > All seemed to be ok until I tried to get phones registered. > I could get a dhcp address but never register. > > I knew something with the WAN qos was screwed up. > I've done it to myself in practice and in the real lab. > > It turns out that I didn't have frts on the physical interface. > Once I put it on, everything started working. > > My questions are: > > 1.) I thought IOS would refuse attaching a class to a dlci without frts on > the physical interface. > 2.) Without frts configured on the physical interface, wouldn't the class > assignment on the dlci (384k) effectively be ignored? > > I know what the config problem was, but I understand what it was actually > causing to happen at the Pvc level. > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
