You got the beast Ajay! It worked as expected....

Thanks.


On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Ajay Viswanath
<ajayviswan...@yahoo.co.in>wrote:

> Suresh,
>
> Make sure you enable the music on hold under the cme. If the moh is not
> specified the BACD will drop the second time it attempts again.
>
> Thanks
>
> --- On *Thu, 28/3/13, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com <
> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com <
> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com>
> Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 85, Issue 104
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Date: Thursday, 28 March, 2013, 4:08 AM
>
> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>     
> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>     http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>     
> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com>
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>     
> ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com>
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. B-ACD drop through to loop ephone hunt a second    time
>       (Suresh Bhandari)
>    2. Re: QOS big question (ikizoo4 kwon)
>    3. MVA functionality (CCIEing)
>    4. Re: B-ACD drop through to loop ephone hunt a    second time
>       (William Bell)
>    5. Re: MVA partial match issue (William Bell)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:56:11 +0545
> From: Suresh Bhandari 
> <bring...@gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=bring...@gmail.com>
> >
> To: 
> "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>"
> <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> >
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD drop through to loop ephone hunt a
>     second    time
> Message-ID:
>     
> <CAExcHf=6g3nivqohbvpnjchxrzccqjd2oyoq2mokoyu+k2f...@mail.gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=k2f...@mail.gmail.com>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Experts!
>
> I configured the embedded drop-through script to match the requirement that
> if, for the first time, both the agents do not pickup the call, it should
> once more attempt to send the call to the agents.
>
> Succeeded for one time only. On the calling phone, I hear the "all of our
> agents ..." or so, and goes on hook, never attempts a second time.
>
> Somewhere I read to tweak the second-greeting-timer to 35secs or less. Did
> it, but no avail.
>
> can anyone shed light on what should i do to achieve the results?
>
> TIA
> --
> Suresh Bhandari
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20130328/d3a0ab13/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:30 -0700
> From: ikizoo4 kwon 
> <ikiz...@hotmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=ikiz...@hotmail.com>
> >
> To: Suresh Bhandari 
> <bring...@gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=bring...@gmail.com>
> >
> Cc: 
> "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>"
> <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> >,
>     singh <singh8...@in.com <http://mc/compose?to=singh8...@in.com>>, "
> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com>
> "
>     
> <ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com>
> >
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question
> Message-ID: 
> <bay172-w45ba04dce7f1bb3edccf0cea...@phx.gbl<http://mc/compose?to=bay172-w45ba04dce7f1bb3edccf0cea...@phx.gbl>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> i am not talking about theory, as you know there is lot of theory around.
> as you can see i enabled FRF.12 and cRTP , then make 1 g729 call, the
> bandwidth priority queue has 25K ( not even close to 12)
>
>
>
> sh policy-map int  Serial0/3/0.2 Serial0/3/0.2: DLCI 103 -
>   Service-policy output: AutoQoS-Policy-Trust
>     queue stats for all priority classes:
>       queue limit 64 packets      (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer
> drops) 0/0/0      (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
>     Class-map: AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust (match-any)      15075 packets,
> 964800 bytes      5 minute offered rate 25000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
> <============================= 25K       Match: ip dscp ef (46)
> 15075 packets, 964800 bytes        5 minute rate 25000 bps      Priority:
> 70% (537 kbps), burst bytes 13400, b/w exceed drops: 0
>       compress:          header ip rtp          UDP/RTP (compression on,
> Cisco, RTP)            Sent:    15075 total, 15074 compressed,
> <================================== cRTP working                     572780
> bytes saved, 331720 bytes sent                     2.72 efficiency
> improvement factor                     99% hit ratio, five minute miss rate
> 0 misses/sec, 0 max                      rate 8000 bps
>
>     Class-map: AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust (match-any)      343 packets,
> 20788 bytes      5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps      Match:
> ip dscp cs3 (24)        343 packets, 20788 bytes        5 minute rate 0
> bps      Match: ip dscp af31 (26)        0 packets, 0 bytes        5 minute
> rate 0 bps      Queueing      queue limit 64 packets      (queue
> depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0      (pkts output/bytes output)
> 0/0      bandwidth 5% (38 kbps)
>     Class-map: class-default (match-any)      430 packets, 47701 bytes
>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps      Match: any
> Queueing      queue limit 64 packets      (queue depth/total
> drops/no-buffer drops/flowdrops) 0/0/0/0      (pkts output/bytes output)
> 5/6516      Fair-queue: per-flow queue limit 16
>
> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:42:00 +0545
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question
> From: bring...@gmail.com <http://mc/compose?to=bring...@gmail.com>
> To: ikiz...@hotmail.com <http://mc/compose?to=ikiz...@hotmail.com>
> CC: singh8...@in.com <http://mc/compose?to=singh8...@in.com>;
> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com>;
> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
>
> Actually it was ?5% overhead. So it comes to 48.72 for 4 calls. So 49 is
> my fav.
>
> HTH
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Suresh Bhandari 
> <bring...@gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=bring...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> In the lab, I really don't know.
>
> But your calculation of the bandwidth is correct. And somewhere I read
> about some ?10% margin on that, so I had 1k bandwidth added to ensure the
> calls. Just a nonsense thought, you can say :)
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:22 PM, ikizoo4 kwon 
> <ikiz...@hotmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=ikiz...@hotmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> i am looking at this issue for a while,,thing is cRTP header size is 2 or
> 4 bytes.
> (8 + 2 + 20)*8*50 = 12 (8 + 4 + 20)*8*50 = 12.8
>
> i know 4 bytes is in case of UDP checksum, but in the real Lab what is the
> case?
>
>
>
> To: 
> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com>;
> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
>
>
> From: singh8...@in.com <http://mc/compose?to=singh8...@in.com>
> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:18:27 +0530
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question
>
>
>
> hi Guys,
>
> I need to configure 384 K link between by HQ and site B site .
>
>
>
> FRF.12 needs to used and configuration of QOS for 4 G729 calls & 16K
> signaling
> CRTP should be also enabled.
>
> How do I do this?
>
> Please help.
>
> -singh
>
>
>
>
> Get Yourself a cool, short @in.com Email ID now!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
>
> --
>
> Suresh Bhandari
>
>
>
>
> --
> Suresh Bhandari
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20130327/17d09e1c/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:51:10 +0300
> From: CCIEing <aboaz...@gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=aboaz...@gmail.com>
> >
> To: 
> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA functionality
> Message-ID:
>     
> <caehpkkkzmo-uqqv-fyc1uehj_zq2mrukg+orwh5yvqlzvhn...@mail.gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=orwh5yvqlzvhn...@mail.gmail.com>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hello Friends...
>
> I have the following setup, I am not sure if the will be suitable to enable
> the MVA feature !
>
> I have CUCM cluster, but his CUCM cluster has no voice GW or DID .. but
> this CUCM cluster has Inter-cluster trunk to another CUCM cluster which has
> the DID numbers ?
>
> Can I configure the MVA for this setup..
>
> Appreciate your input.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20130327/251469fb/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 18:21:11 -0400
> From: William Bell 
> <b...@ucguerrilla.com<http://mc/compose?to=b...@ucguerrilla.com>
> >
> To: Suresh Bhandari 
> <bring...@gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=bring...@gmail.com>
> >
> Cc: 
> "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>"
> <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> >
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD drop through to loop ephone hunt
>     a    second time
> Message-ID: 
> <85fe3623-4456-4125-8c51-f62b799f2...@ucguerrilla.com<http://mc/compose?to=85fe3623-4456-4125-8c51-f62b799f2...@ucguerrilla.com>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Suresh,
>
> If I follow your question you are looking for a way to cause the BACD
> application to:
>
> 1. Drop through to a hunt group
>
> 2. Ring the ephone-dns in the hunt group
>
> 3. Play the "all of our agents are busy" prompt
>
> 4. Attempt to ring out the agents again
>
> 5. Hang up
>
>
> If that is accurate then I think you want to tweak the param
> max-time-call-retry timer. The default is 600. If you copied from Cisco
> BACD examples then you most likely have this parameter set to 700.  Try
> setting it to 30.
>
> After changing the parameter, do the following:
>
> R3#show call application session
> Session ID 2A
>
>             App: app-b-acd
>            Type: Service
>             Url: builtin:app_b_acd_script.tcl
>
>
> R3#call application session stop id 2A
>   Stopping session
>
> R3#
> .Mar 27 22:27:13.547: %IVR-6-APP_INFO: TCL B-ACD:  >>> B-ACD Service
> Terminated <<<
>
> HTH.
>
> -Bill
>
>
> On Mar 27, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Suresh Bhandari wrote:
>
> > Experts!
> >
> > I configured the embedded drop-through script to match the requirement
> that if, for the first time, both the agents do not pickup the call, it
> should once more attempt to send the call to the agents.
> >
> > Succeeded for one time only. On the calling phone, I hear the "all of
> our agents ..." or so, and goes on hook, never attempts a second time.
> >
> > Somewhere I read to tweak the second-greeting-timer to 35secs or less.
> Did it, but no avail.
> >
> > can anyone shed light on what should i do to achieve the results?
> >
> > TIA
> > --
> > Suresh Bhandari
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> --
> William Bell
> blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
> Follow me on twitter @ucguerrilla
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20130327/c32ea150/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 18:38:05 -0400
> From: William Bell 
> <b...@ucguerrilla.com<http://mc/compose?to=b...@ucguerrilla.com>
> >
> To: Sergey Heyphets 
> <ser...@heyphets.com<http://mc/compose?to=ser...@heyphets.com>
> >
> Cc: 
> "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> ,
>     
> \(ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>\)"
> <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> >
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA partial match issue
> Message-ID: 
> <b3edca56-e694-4a2e-a0af-d10149dac...@ucguerrilla.com<http://mc/compose?to=b3edca56-e694-4a2e-a0af-d10149dac...@ucguerrilla.com>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> I concur with Sergey.
>
> On Mar 27, 2013, at 2:14 PM, Sergey Heyphets wrote:
>
> > The prompts you hear on the when you dial-in are the results of IOS
> executing the VXML script, which was defined in the application/service
> definition. When you, however, press 1 to make the call and enter the
> number, the VXML script instructs the IOS to place the call to the MVA
> number defined under media resources. So if you don't have the MVA number
> defined under Media Resources, the initial prompts would work, but placing
> the call would fail.
> >
> > Sergey
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Barrera, Hugo 
> > <hugo.barr...@nexusis.com<http://mc/compose?to=hugo.barr...@nexusis.com>>
> wrote:
> > But would the MVA number still work on the gateway when you dial in? May
> it would huh because the MVA AA on the IOS is separate?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hugo
> >
> >
> >
> > From: William Bell 
> > [mailto:b...@ucguerrilla.com<http://mc/compose?to=b...@ucguerrilla.com>]
>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 4:47 AM
> > To: Barrera, Hugo
> > Cc: Justin Carney; donny f; 
> > ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>,
> (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>);
> michael.se...@compucom.com<http://mc/compose?to=michael.se...@compucom.com>;
> networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com>
> >
> >
> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA partial match issue
> >
> >
> >
> > I have ran into a similar problem. In my case I would get a fast busy
> after entering the extension number followed by #.
> >
> >
> >
> > The issue was I neglected to provision Mobile Voice Access under Media
> Resources.
> >
> > On Tuesday, March 26, 2013, Barrera, Hugo wrote:
> >
> > Regarding MVA during my first attempt (real lab) I had it working except
> for when I dialed in and tried to call another 4-digit ext like SAPH1 or
> SBPH2 any ideas why that didn?t work?
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hugo
> >
> >
> >
> > From: 
> > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>[mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>]
> On Behalf Of Justin Carney
> > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 1:51 AM
> > To: donny f
> > Cc: 
> > ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>,
> (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>);
> michael.se...@compucom.com<http://mc/compose?to=michael.se...@compucom.com>;
> networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA partial match issue
> >
> >
> >
> > You can have the rd with 7 digits only and without the 9 for pstn access
> - use either application dial rules (match 7 digits, prefix 9) or a
> translation pattern to modify the rd to match your existing local route
> pattern.
> >
> > I'm not sure if there's an MVA bug in this version of cucm, but its
> pretty easy to configure it so that you always have a full match since you
> will likely have only one rd.  This is what I do for the lab.
> >
> > A real world (for nanp) example of MVA partial match would be using e164
> address for all rd (+1 npa-nxx-xxxx) and set partial match to 10 or 7
> depending on whether all sites receive inbound ani as 10d for local calls
> or if any sites receives only 7d.  This would also work for lab, but takes
> extra steps if you aren't already required to use + dialing
> >
> > For partial match to work, the rd must be longer than the inbound ani
> (ani 7d and rd +11d).  You cannot use partial match with an ani longer than
> the rd (ani 10d and rd 7d), in this case your options would be to apply
> inbound transformation on the gateway to make rd ani shorter (ie match the
> rd) or make your rd longer and manipulate outbound dnis to make it route.
> >
> > On Mar 25, 2013 2:00 AM, "donny f" 
> > <f.faraday...@gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=f.faraday...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> > hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > I config the Service parameter for MVA , using "partial match" 7 digit
> . However when I dial the RD using 7 digit ,it never works.
> >
> > seem like UCM only take "Full match".  I heard this is bug,
> >
> >
> >
> > Any suggestion for the work around if still want to use "partial match" ?
> >
> >
> >
> > d
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:58 AM, 
> > <michael.se...@compucom.com<http://mc/compose?to=michael.se...@compucom.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> > I think you are doing everything right just need a few tweaks.  Place a
> call from the PSTN line 2 to 3033300 and do debug isdn q931 on gateway.
> What digits do you see for the calling number.  7 or 10?  If seeing 7
> digits inbound change your Remote Destination Number to 5252222, without
> the 9.  If you are seeing 10 digits inbound the NPA, NXX, TNTN change your
> remote destination number to XXX5252222, in other words match what you're
> seeing in the isdn debug for calling party and make that you're Remote
> Destination Number.
> >
> >
> > Do NOT require the prefix of 9 on the Remote Destination Number.  Also,
> under Remote Destination Information make sure you are putting a tick in
> Mobile Phone checkbox and a tick in the Enable Mobile Connect checkbox.
> >
> > Otherwise your configuration looks good.  Hope you find this helpful.
> >
> > Michael Sears
> > CCIE 38404
> >
> > Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 18:23:01 +0530
> > From: sanity insanity 
> > <networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com>
> >
> > To: 
> > ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobile Voice Access not working since many
> >         days!!
> > Message-ID:
> >         <CAG4ZmYXmD5Xj67pwV+_GpaBEDJOYdyg+
> zbnmugtsfuj3nsx...@mail.gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=zbnmugtsfuj3nsx...@mail.gmail.com>
> >
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> >
> > I have been trying this config for MVA  for close to 2 weeks now and it
> does not work . Here are the details....
> >
> >
> > The Issue :
> > ==================
> >
> > I am trying to Intiate a Call from PSTN phone to site B gateway (H323)
> > 3033300 it should ask for
> > authentication once authenticated press 1 to make any 4 digit calls if
> it is from SB phone 1 . Make sure to display 4 digits number for calling
> number along with calling name "SB Phone 1" they can use local gateway to
> make the call.
> >
> > Also 2nd line on PSTN phone should be used to dial 3033300 and you will
> prompted to login.
> >
> >
> >
> > Details:
> > =============
> >
> > My config is following....
> >
> > 1) The dial-peers are set in the following way
> >
> > dial-peer voice 102 voip
> >  preference 2
> >  destination-pattern 3300
> >  session target ipv4:<ip address
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> --
> William Bell
> blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
> Follow me on twitter @ucguerrilla
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20130327/0989f0ab/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCIE_Voice mailing list
> CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://mc/compose?to=CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
>
>
> End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 85, Issue 104
> *******************************************
>
>


-- 
Suresh Bhandari
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to