The workaround is to change the service parameter for default intra-region
codec to g729.  You will then obviously need to update your regions for
site a b c to use g711 rather than 'default' which is now g729.

This bug mentioned above is where a gk send a call to cucm and it doesn't
look at the region's setting (where you define a gk region and set to g729
for intra region) but instead only looks at the service parameter.
On Apr 8, 2013 11:26 AM, "Suresh Bhandari" <bring...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sergey, and all,
>
> I had hard-coded the G729 codec from UCM side, and when I did the same for
> voip dial peer pointing to RAS, it didn't show up, as it is the default.
> Tried with voice-class codec as well, but no luck.
>
> Will check the Bug as well. Thank Ramcharan for the bug id.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Sergey Heyphets <ser...@heyphets.com>wrote:
>
>> Alternatively, you can just set your GK region to use G729 within the
>> region and G729 with all the other region (e.g. hardcode on region, rather
>> than use system default).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Mohamed Gazzaz <mgaz...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Suresh,
>>>
>>> I think you are hitting a known bug . Please go to service parameters
>>> --> call manager  and change the following to G729
>>>
>>> Intraregion Audio Codec Default: G729
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mohamed Gazzaz
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 19:02:14 +0545
>>> From: bring...@gmail.com
>>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME -> GK -> UCM bandwidth
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello Experts!
>>>
>>> I have HQ as the GK and CME, CUCM publisher and subscriber are
>>> registered to GK in single zone. Further, GK Trunk is in separate region/DP
>>> with hard-coded G.729 codec with other regions/itself as well.
>>>
>>> When I call from HQ to CME side, and check "sh gatek call" it shows that
>>> the call is consuming 16K bandwidth, which is expected.
>>>
>>> The dial-peer to CME has g729r8 as codec (the default one).
>>>
>>> Even then, the same command displays that the bandwidth consumed is 128K.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on what probably I missed?
>>> --
>>> Suresh Bhandari
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ For more information
>>> regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
>>> www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check
>>> out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Suresh Bhandari
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to