I would also agree. Not sure what a unicast beacon would even be. Sorry for not catching that.
Regards, Jeff Rensink : Sr Instructor : iPexpert <http://www.ipexpert.com/> CCIE # 24834 :: Wireless / R&S :: World-Class Cisco Certification Training Direct: +1.810.326.1444 :: Free Videos <http://www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc> :: Free Training / Product Offerings <http://www.facebook.com/ipexpert> :: CCIE Blog <http://blog.ipexpert.com/> :: Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/ipexpert> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:47 PM, George Stefanick < [email protected]> wrote: > I would agree with your statement .. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jan 8, 2014, at 9:19 PM, "Jay Killion (jakillio)" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi all - > > I'm working on WB1 : task 4.7. The requirement is that *unicast*beacons > should only be sent every 50ms. The solution guide shows that you > should change the "Beacon Period" under the radio general properties. > > I get that this would be the right solution for broadcast beacons, but > the part that threw me off was "unicast" beacons. Unless I'm missing > something, I thought beacons were always broadcast – by very definition. > Wouldn't changing the "Beacon Period" just change the normal, broadcast > beacon rate? > > Thanks > > Jay Killion, CCIE #17873 R/S > > _______________________________________________ > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > > > _______________________________________________ > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc >
_______________________________________________ Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
