Your solution should work fine. I think any sort of child policy would be way too deep for our lab. Same with any policing/shaping.
Regards, Jeff Rensink : Sr Instructor : iPexpert <http://www.ipexpert.com/> CCIE # 24834 :: Wireless / R&S :: World-Class Cisco Certification Training Direct: +1.810.326.1444 :: Free Videos <http://www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc> :: Free Training / Product Offerings <http://www.facebook.com/ipexpert> :: CCIE Blog <http://blog.ipexpert.com/> :: Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/ipexpert> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Istvan Zsolt Czobor <[email protected]>wrote: > Hello, > > I had a question about a solution in the DSG1, question 2.7: > "On CAT4, any non-voice traffic on the data or guest VLANs should be set > to use > the default COS value. Voice traffic should be trusted." > > In the solution section there are child policies configured with > interfaces and exceed actions, but I don't understand why do I have to > configure these child policies, why doesn't it enough just to trust > dscp or cos values for voice/signaling traffic and set just the > class-default non-voice traffic to dscp default? > If I want to match both interfaces and acl, I could do it under the first > RTP-CM as well. > Like: > class-map match-all RTP-CM > match access-group name RTP-ACL > match input-interface FastEthernet1/0/1 ... > > where am I wrong? Can you clarify? > > Congrat' to Jay! > > Thanks and Best Regards > Istvan > > > _______________________________________________ > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc >
_______________________________________________ Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
