woot! thanks that is good news

Craig Sutherland wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We've now put a patch into the code to change the behaviour of queues
> with respect to force builds. You'll need to get the application from
> the nightly builds and then configure your queues as described at
> http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/Queue+Configuration.
>
> Thanks to Daniel Hommel and James Chaldecott for their help on this
> one.
>
>
> Craig
>
> On Sep 5, 2:32�am, Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I agree, a force build should have precedence, I will give the patch a
> > try and see how she goes. Thanks for pointing it out Daniel
> >
> > Daniel Hommel wrote:
> > > Craig Sutherland writes:
> > > > The real question is should we set a precedence of build requests
> > > > (i.e. should ForceBuilds be considered more important than
> > > > IfModificationExists). If a higher precedence request is received,
> > > > then we would overwrite the lower precedence request? Any comments?
> >
> > > FYI, seems like an issue for this topic was opened already (CCNET-1095)
> > > and a patch is attached.
> >
> > > Personally i think giving a force build request a higher priority than
> > > an interval trigger request makes sense. What i don't know is if it can
> > > lead to problems if an interval trigger request gets removed from the
> > > queue in favor of a force build request.
> >
> > > regards,
> >
> > > Daniel

Reply via email to