On Dec 11, 6:18 pm, "Jon W" <[email protected]> wrote: > would be nice if it would would list the project(s) broken, and the > possible developer(s) who broke the build. An added bonus would be > some statistics of who breaks the build the most as to shame the bad > developers.
Not sure I'd want to work at a place that does this. I'm sure you could customize the dashboard to show this. But, how do you know who broke the build? Many times out builds consist of multiple changesets checked in by various devs. You might also want to consider doing isolated builds in a dev branch then merging the results into trunk if it doesn't fail. Then you can see how many times the build broke on each branch. Once again, I think positive reinforcement is better than negative reinforcement. BOb
