Hi: Excellent.
Thanks Mark K On Jan 16, 2:09 pm, Ruben Willems <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > take the latest nightly > buildhttp://ccnetlive.thoughtworks.com/CCNet-builds/1.4.1/ > > the latest ones with number 1.4.2 > > the seem to be placed in a wrong folder. > > with kind regards > Ruben Willems > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 4:31 PM, markk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi: > > > Awesome. Which build will it be in? > > > Thanks > > > mark K > > > On Jan 15, 9:34 am, Ruben Willems <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi > > > > issue has been fixed, > > > there was already a function available to remove the read-only bits of a > > > file, > > > it was not called for this clean up task :-( > > > > with kind regards > > > Ruben Willems > > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Ruben Willems <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > > read only can be altered, but suppose another user has copied in a > > file, > > > > and ccnet can not delete it because of OS security settings, > > > > or file is in use by some other process, ... > > > > > I was thinking of placing the delete in a try cacth block, and > > > > log every failure of the delete, togeher witht the reason. > > > > > so we know why the delete failed. > > > > > with kind regards > > > > Ruben Willems > > > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:00 PM, markk <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > >> Hi: > > > > >> Thanks for taking on this change! Perhaps the smart thing here would > > > >> be to give the task an arguement that allows the user to make that > > > >> determination. If it is read only (or some other attribute for that > > > >> matter) change the attrib, and delete it. > > > > >> what do you think about that? > > > > >> Mark K > > > > >> On Jan 14, 9:39 am, Ruben Willems <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > Hi > > > > >> > Thats good to know, > > > > >> > now the big question : should the artifact cleanup remove the > > read-only > > > >> bit? > > > >> > the bit is there for a reason ;-) > > > > >> > maybe we can skip the readonly files, but continue on deleteing > > other > > > >> ones, > > > >> > and report that file X was not deleted becaus it was readonly. > > > > >> > What do you think? > > > > >> > with kind regards > > > >> > Ruben Willems > > > > >> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:33 PM, markk <[email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > Hi Ruben: > > > > >> > > Changing the properties (no read only) worked for me. > > > > >> > > Thanks for the help. > > > > >> > > Mark K > > > > >> > > On Jan 13, 4:46 pm, Ruben Willems <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > Hi > > > > >> > > > this works for me, > > > >> > > > logDir specified or not, or you sure that you do not see > > anything in > > > >> the > > > >> > > > console window? > > > >> > > > I did notice that when there is a read only file in the log dir, > > the > > > >> > > > deletion stops. > > > > >> > > > with kind regards > > > >> > > > Ruben Willems > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Ruben Willems < > > > >> [email protected] > > > >> > > >wrote: > > > > >> > > > > Hi > > > > >> > > > > this should not happen, I'll look into it > > > > >> > > > > with kind regards > > > >> > > > > Ruben Willems > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 6:45 PM, markk < > > > >> [email protected]> > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > >> Hi All: > > > > >> > > > >> I have successfully set up cc.net 1.4.2.14 and want to take > > > >> advantage > > > >> > > > >> of the Artifact Cleanup task. I have it in my ccnet.config > > as > > > >> such: > > > > >> > > > >> <publisher> > > > >> > > > >> <xmllogger logDir="pathtobuildlog"/> > > > >> > > > >> <!-- this is where to add artifact cleanup publisher > > task > > > >> --> > > > >> > > > >> <artifactcleanup > > cleanUpMethod="DeleteBuildsOlderThanXDays" > > > >> > > > >> cleanUpValue="7"/> > > > >> > > > >> <publisher/> > > > > >> > > > >> To date I haven't seen ANY cleanup happening. The log files > > > >> still > > > >> > > > >> exist as they did prior to the build. I haven't seen any > > errors > > > >> > > > >> either. > > > > >> > > > >> Can anyone give me a clue as to what I am doing wrong? > > > > >> > > > >> Thanks > > > > >> > > > >> Mark K
