This is still an issue on the latest build. The LastChangeLabeller is not good enough, and requires a patch.
The problem has also recently been mentioned e.g. in the following ccnet-user threads: "<LastChangelabeller> :Accurev/CCNET error: Given Update...". "LastChangeLabeller issue in case of a forced build with no changes in SVN" "LastChangeLabeller and Unknown with Accurev" A patch has been submitted by luke to ccnet-devel, thread "Improving the LastChangeLabeler". His patch appends a ".1" or increment an existing integer to the last label, instead of creating an "unkown" label. Is this good enough for everyone? In this patch: - If you change the Prefix in your config file, and then make a forced build with no modifications, then his patch will return an incremented label with the old prefix. Is this ok? - There is no "AllowDuplicateSubsequentLabels" to choose if you only want the LastChangeLabeller to return the latest label, or if you want it to return the latest label with an incremented suffix. What do you want? I would be happy to contribute if could just get this into the trunk! Regards, //P-J On 10 Feb, 21:31, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey thanks for the response. To be clear: > > I am using the "lastChangeLabeller" with the Accurev source control > system. And I have noticed the EXACT issue: That if a build process is > triggered and "No > Modifications" are detected. The labeller labels the build as > "UNKNOWN". > Another wrinkle: because Im doing snapshots of each build, that name > 'unknown' is already being used, and the build fails. > I agree that, "if no modifications are detected, then the label should > simply > remain unchanged and be what it was for the previous build" > Or something unique (iterative). > This is a show stopper for me. If I cant fix it, we will have to > change the tagging and labeling to date based, I'd rather keep it > transaction based. > > Is there a way around this? > > Im using CCNET version : 1.4.0.3524 > Id appreciate if someone could share a workaround/fix or definitely > tell me I have to suck it up and upgrade. > > thanks, > Russ > > On Feb 10, 3:13 am, CinnamonDonkey <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I'm affriad I still haven't tried this out yet. > > > I was hoping for 1.4.3 to be released before I do any upgrades. Having > > made so many changes to my installation I want to minimise the numbert > > of times I do upgrades. > > > Shaun > > > On 9 Feb, 21:23, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > I have a similiar problem as well. > > > > On Feb 9, 11:14 am, P-J <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > What's the status on this? I have the same problem. > > > > > When theLastChangeLabellerstarts to remember the last label, it > > > > would also be a good idea to add the "AllowDuplicateSubsequentLabels" > > > > property and suffix functionality from the FileLabeller. > > > > > //P-J > > > > > On 2 Feb, 11:09, CinnamonDonkey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Thank you for the quick response Ruben. > > > > > > I'll check out the latest build. > > > > > > On 2 Feb, 10:05, Ruben Willems <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > can you simulate this with the latest build > > > > > > see previous mail > > > > > > > with kind regards > > > > > > Ruben Willems > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:46 AM, CinnamonDonkey < > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > I am using the "lastChangeLabeller" with our Perforce source > > > > > > > control > > > > > > > system. I have noticed that if a build process is triggered and > > > > > > > "No > > > > > > > Modifications" are detected. The labeller labels the build as > > > > > > > "UNKNOWN". > > > > > > > > Surely, if no modifications are detected, then the label should > > > > > > > simply > > > > > > > remain unchanged and be what it was for the previous build? > > > > > > > > Is there a way around this? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Shaun- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Dölj citerad text - > > - Visa citerad text -
